Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: S.C. Barnard who wrote (5411)	4/9/1999 9:24:00 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

S.C.--Try these two links for information: y2ktimebomb.com y2ktimebomb.com

To: S.C. Barnard who wrote (5411)	4/9/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: Jeff Redman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

The Julian date of 09999, if your program still has only 2 digits for a year, is as overblown as the problem that was supposed to happen at the beginning of the year with programs that looked at the year 99 as an end of file or error condition. This is another predication that is going down the drain, the doom and gloom crowd will not want to talk about another overblown hype that did not happen. It has been over 10 years since I have seen any program use 99 or 09999 for an end of file, etc. and even then I saw it in very few programs. All of our programs that had this kind of logic were fixed last year.