Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ABER RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WillP who wrote (1279)	4/10/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2006

Congratulations! That's a classic! Everyone keeps telling me what a great guy GT USED to be, but in my view he's been a pompous overated pratt since I came on the threads last fall. I don't know if his nose is out of joint as has been suggested, or if he's in transition from Puberty to senility withou passing through maturity or what , but I wish I had the knowledge and backgtound and above all the patience to respond as you just did. As they used to say in times of Yore "The King is dead...Long live the King" Cheers

To: WillP who wrote (1279)	4/11/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: George J. Tromp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2006

My premise...is that Winspear has consistently matched or exceeded the amount of information provided by the Diavik Diamond Project at every level of exploration. Well that is fine if Winspear was sitting on multiple pipe emplacements, showing sufficient tonnage to warrant skipping what is normally required with reporting Juniors, that being timely delivery of material news. You can twist the events as you wish, but the fact remains, economic pipes dont show large stones early, most large stones reveal themselves after substantial tonnage has been extracted. I am rather surprised that they found the visible diamond in the core, however the world class grades show the economics of the deposit. I find it surprising as well that one which claims so much talent is trying to compare reporting news between companies. Winspear delivered a 200 ton (mini-bulk sample) restrictive and contained with a small area from a dyke where proven tonnage is yet being drilled and not backed by a feasibility study. What more needs to be said. They promoted the stock on the 301US per carat values, they purposefully withheld the complete valuation breakdowns as a carrot in front of investors, then when scrutinized more closely by the Canadian Diamond analysts expeditiously reported the valuation breakdowns by necessity not by the goodness of their dear hearts. No the news didnt blind side me, I bought the stock based on the fundamnetals at much lower prices, evidenced by your timely posting of #6109. I am not on the defense here pal, I am not the one daily musing about Winspears potential. nor am I advising investors to buy stock which has been fully valued, I leave that to the people that failed to justify their investment, and deem it essential to buy at higher prices, and to daily remind themselves and others of the merits of their decisions. For what it is worth, Aber did release incremental grades during their bulk samples. Lets see if Winspear does as well. Regards George