Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : A Diversified Environmental Company ... CNHH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (139)	4/10/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: EightyEight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 211

No dentures!! Full stop. Getting more interesting here. LOLOL IKAR and EUTO gurus should not be casting stones. IMO. DF144 and DF affiliates and posting IR guy. Too much! regards, VL P.S. When is the push to $40 a share?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (139)	4/10/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 211

There you are ... then your little OFF TOPIC should have been disclosed. Typical manipulation of innuendoes that you are infamous for. Cheap shot to say the least... OH for 9 month the Internet God CLAN has been anything but civil... Now I am showing the internet what you are about and now you want me to be civil. LOL ... typical ... what you going to threaten me, or sue me or character assassinate me agin o innuendoes. Well bring it on .... GB

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (139)	4/10/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 211

One other thing sir (an attempt to be civil HOWEVER no respect intended) .. In regards to yours and your crew's innuendoes of a conspiracy and twisted constant misinformation an twisting of the facts, I realize you have the right to complain to the SEC with all your speculations and innuendoes. I wonder if the SEC would be interested in you designing EUTO's website and special e-mail that you and your crew used to scalp EUTO in 1997. However, innuendo, euphemism, nuance and outright deception are all conversational devices necessary to living in the modern world especially the internet and cyberworld. Its an art that been developed into a high science by modern spin doctors and the other media manipulators. I have been reading about innuendoes though and I am finding this in a lot of cases: However, on Nov. 23, the appellate court completely exonerated *****, finding that the allegations rested on "innuendo," and were not supported by the facts. Quote from Bob Simms: “Nothing is a better defense that the facts.” Quote from a CEO I believe children's beverages, “Nothing messes up a good story worse than facts.” Here is a song that I found interesting: Innuendo (Queen) While the sun hangs in the sky and the desert has sand While the waves crash in the sea and meet the land While there's a wind and the stars and the rainbow Till the mountains crumble into the plain Oh yes we'll keep on tryin' Tread that fine line Oh we'll keep on tryin' yeah Just passing our time While we live according to race, colour or creed While we rule by blind madness and pure greed Our lives dictated by tradition, superstition, false religion Through the eons, and on and on Oh yes we'll keep on tryin' We'll tread that fine line Oh we'll keep on tryin' Till the end of time Till the end of time I know you and know you are relentless at this ... Like the lyrics states you are going to keep on trying. Lets save ourselves a lot of time and wasting thread space ... if you have some facts to support your innuendo opinion and convenient logic then by all means please post them. I would love to see the facts instead of your infamous convenient logic on CNHH to justify your opinion. I will be more than happy to respond. Now if you want I will start a thread on SI "Alan Markoff vs Ga Bard / Innuendo & Convenient Wisdom or Logic vs Facts" I am cognizant that there are folks out there that are mad as hornets about the octane enhancer possibly coming into CNHH and not MIDL. You seem to forget I am the second biggest internet shareholder in Midland P stock and that I was still buying at $26.00 a share. Though I know you do not believe that either when I told you on the phone last August… :-) GB