SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10289)4/10/1999 4:21:00 PM
From: Pallisard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Do you and Mark Visnic communicate regularly? E-mail or PM?
Do you get a lot of publicity for the dog pound site by posting here?
Why haven't you responded to Mooter's proposition on the Yahoo thread? You can always say no.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10289)4/10/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: J. Liu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Wexler

There is a message to you from the yahoo board. Here it is. Just in case you missed it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill, You Haven't Responded to My Bet.
by: mooter775
10174 of 10188
$100,000, even money. I say $ 13.00 (UP $ 6) before $ 1.00 (down $ 6). We'll escrow the $200,000 with a 3rd party financial institution.

Put up or shut up. I'm indifferent to which alternative.

Posted: 04/09/99, 5:20PM EDT as a reply to: Msg 10171 by BillWexler
----------------------------------------------------------------------
jliu



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10289)4/10/1999 5:03:00 PM
From: john t. brice  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
wee willie> Is this an example of your patterns of logic? I must have missed something, I thought I was pointing out that companies like Motorola are making plans for products that will require batteries VLNC claims to have the ability to supply. Please enlighten me as to just how I implied a "lie". duckster