Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : A Diversified Environmental Company ... CNHH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dusty who wrote (144)	4/10/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 211

Dusty your vicious campaign on SI is what caught the eye of the WSJ... I did supply post links from you and Alan and others but they were not used. :-( I read in the article and felt it had more holes than Swiss Cheese; . LOL ... well DUSTY you would not know a fact if it stuck you in the eye,. Most already know that. Trading logs and bank accounts records are my proof but then again you never wasor are known for being a DDer and having any facts. Just an emotional woman with only innuendoes. The WSJ does not carelessly write something like that without the PROOF. But you do not want the proof that kills everything you have done and posted for 8 months... LMAO LOL .. Yes I did stop posting and willingly sharing DD and I did not post .... but OH well. I intend to expose the INTERNET CLAN AND THAT INCLUDES YOU ESPECIALLY ... LOL yes you always are entitled to your opinion though you have nothing other than emotional concepts as the underlying basis. Where is all the proof to your 9 months of assassinating. Where is the duped you keep harping about. One day I hope you do stand by your actions and posts. Just like the SEC asked, "What was the underlying basis for this post Mr. Swancey?" and I gave them the basis which was not emotional prespective but a fact. Wonder how you are going to stand up to that should you ever have to justify your posts. Everything I post I am ready to defend with the PROOF ... not some your word against mine. OH now it is a MAY have huh .. hmmm Well, everyone knew and I have proofed many releases on many stocks and will continue to do so. You rent bowling alleys for now and I am a webhost and for the moment an IR for just one company at the moment ... I am turning down others because the new law says I can't own stock in the companies. That was a good law. :-) SO I resigned from CNHH so i can buy stock in companies. Amazing ALan was a part of the editing process but that is NOT a problem NOR was DF and his action that cost the MIDL shareholders. What about the guy I was referred to in the editing which was one of his folloers as well on several of the releases. LOL .. again selective point and the releases were truthful that I know of. I did not author only proofed along with the assisstance of the man Alan referred me to. There was not a false release that I proofed. Oh DUSTY I am a private investor and was at that time totally. :-) Like it or not. I would say drafting/editing press releases and having access to inside information prior to the investing public qualifies you as one who was directly involved. Then why are you teamed with ALAN he knew about every release the minute it was sent to me AND the other fellow ... I did not trade on that information wonder if Alan and his crew did??? Nor was I directly involved but I would like for you to have to prove that. And the TRUTH is coming out I grant you ... I was not involved but you stand by that and I by what I know and can prove... I hope you have the proof. You hate me because I had the audacity to question you about matters you did not want disclosed ONe I do not have to disclose it anything but compensation if I edit news releases I do not have to disclose anything to you. DUSTY post where I have to. WHERE is the LAW? I dislike you because you are the worse DDer and the WORSE emotional roller coaster on line. YOU NEVER HAVE DD OR FACTS ... Just like you jumped on the Debenture thing because ALan posted it and I side steppedit. NOW you want to refer it to another stock >>> AGAIN HOW CONVENIENT!!! ... you are duped and being played so you get to take the so called flaming. YOU STILL HAVE NOTHING you can prove as misconduct BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST except in your mind. If I am guilty then so is ALAN and his referred friend. You are so bias it is unbelieveable. I shall continue to endeavor to stick with facts, as I have always done LMAO ... I HAVE MOST OF YOUR POSTS SINCE YOU STARTED THIS WITCH HUNT ... SHOW ME WHERE YOU HAVE FACTS. You have a good day ... GB

To: Dusty who wrote (144)	4/10/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: Binder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 211

Dusty, I hardly think anyone here believes that you honestly just wanted Gary's opinion on the impact of debentures on a stock. You and Alan and Jim came on this thread to intentionally give the reader the impression that CNHH somehow had debentures, and the result was mayhem and insanity. If you have evidence of debentures, put it up. Otherwise, can it. This is the same thing you did on the Midland thread; coming on, making an implication, posting absolutely nothing to substantaite it, and moving on. Certainly your right to do so, but don't expect anyone to take you very seriously. Binder

To: Dusty who wrote (144)	4/10/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Binder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 211

Dusty, When you referenced the author of the WSJ thing, you said "I believe he accepted whatever information he was given in good faith and published it." Supposing this were true, what would make this any different than one who believes in the "DD" that is before them, and posting that DD on the internet? In my opinion, the WSJ guy did not simply take what Gary told him at face value. I would think that he would be required to check it out for himself before his publisher would allow his story to run. I would think that even if a publication as respectable as the Wall Street Journal didn't see a need to verify their stories, their insurance carrier would. Just my opinion, Binder