Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (10298)	4/10/1999 7:30:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Fred, you protest too much. I did not make any comparison between IPMCF and VLNC, if it was so misconstrued by you, blame some degree of excess paranoia. Can't you read? I said quite clearly that I am not getting into the argument between Mooter and Wexler, the simple reason is that I really do not know, and this point I do not have an opinion. Maybe you know for sure, but my feeling is that more than knowledge, you rely on hope. I have stated a large number of times, if VLNC gets a timely order, it will see at least $11. If it does not, it needs more financing (and I also stated that the new CFO is probably capable of getting some of it, and probably not the toxic kind, since Lev has already shown he fully comprehend the implications of toxic financing by getting the toxic clause out of the first tranche from CC). Just stop seeing enemies around each corner. Another little advice, do not fall in love with any stock and never commit more than a rational portion of your assets to any single investment. No matter how promising it might be. Zeev

To: FMK who wrote (10298)	4/10/1999 7:32:00 PM
From: Richard M. Jimmink	Respond to of 27311

FMk, As I have stated a few months ago, I was the licensing manager of high technology for over an extended period of time. I have scanned the Valence patents and I concur, Valence has a proprietary position to license this technology for significant dollars, up front !!!!. However, it is always difficult to license technology, without first having established a viable commercial product marketing position. Valence may have the position, they are just playing the cards close to the vest. IMHO Long Valence RMJ