To: jbe who wrote (34288 ) 4/10/1999 9:31:00 PM From: Chuzzlewit Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
My dear Joan, I promise to no longer behave like an eel. I will be forthcoming. I have turned over a new leaf. I do not have my fingers (or paws crossed). Cash flow analysis isn't that hard, and I will be thrilled to walk you through one. Any one of your choice (how's THAT for an offer?) I will atone for my previous sins, and start at the top. Here is my statement of principles and philosophy (I hate that when applied to something as trivial as the stock market, but what else is there?). So here goes (deep breath): There are basically two styles of investing, and I will present them as extremes of a continuum: 1. Find a company that is going to make lots of money in the future, put your money in it, and hang on for the ride. You only get out when you figured out that you were wrong to begin with, or the company changes in a fundamental and permanent way, which causes you to change your mind about the future. Companies like AOL, CSCO, DELL, and TLAB fit the growth description. After you've got a nice list, look it over for stocks that may cost too much and eliminate them. I can show you how I do this later on. This is called growth investing . I love it. But growth investing is very risky. 2 Find companies that are worth a lot, but nobody know about. Right now there may be scads of these trading as small cap stocks (market cap under $500MM). Buy them, let everybody know what a wonderful company these stocks represent, and sell them when the herd figures out how good the companies are. This is called value investing . I hate it. Value investing can be about as exciting as watching paint dry. But sometimes you can get massacred here also. Dare I mention oil service stocks in December of 1997? The best investment is one where you can achieve both goals (growth and value) in one investment. Like when I bought TLAB this fall at $33. This kind of thing is very rare. There are two more styles of investing that I don't consider investing at all, but for the sake of completeness I'll shove them in here: 3. Momentum investing . This is actually a form of timing, but it has some sufficiently different characteristics that I figured it should have its own name. Put your money in a stock because it went up a lot. Momentum investors believe that there is inertia to stock prices. Once a price starts to move, so they think, it will continue to move. They are fond of phrases like "Don't catch falling knives", and, "The trend is your friend". Since these people are unlikely to waste their time reading such mundane things as 10-Ks and 10-Qs, and indeed some of them don't even know what business their investment is in (true!), I have a hard time thinking of this as investing. Variants are investing in stocks just befor they split, etc. 4. Trading . Now these folks believe that the market can be timed. They generate lots of fancy graphs (some of them are quite pretty and suitable for framing), they use computers to generate statistics (but don't subject their statistics to statistical analysis -- oh well!), and borrow liberally from statistics and probability theory argot. Unfortunately, the language is there, but the substance isn't. You can spot these guys because they will talk about MACD and double bottoms, head and shoulders and necklinbes. Some talk about dojis. Don't ask! It's basically dowsing with a 21st century veneer. IMO of course. Since this is a "feelies" thread, let us agree to limit this portion of the interview to generalities. No math, no statistics, no science. Just generalities. We can switch to an appropriate thread for details. TTFN, a very chastened and contrite Chuzzlewit