Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10316)	4/10/1999 9:35:00 PM
From: Razorbak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Does IBM have more capital to exploit their patents than Valence does?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10316)	4/10/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: FMK	Respond to of 27311

Zeev, " keep your eye on the ball, not the patents". You spent countless posts discussing and analyzing Valence patents! Did you have your eye on the ball or were you distracted? I agree patents alone are only one ingredient, but a huge factor in Valence's case in view of the manganese oxide and phosphate patents. The people behind the company are another very important ingredient. IMO that ingredient is probably why Bellcore owns 1.5 million shares of Valence but has no stake in any of its other licensees that anyone has been able to find. I hope you take a position in Valence before it gets too pricey for you. It would be interesting to read your posts once you have a purpose other than to drive the price down!

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10316)	4/11/1999 12:44:00 AM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

<<(I have 40 patents of my own, not in one field but in a plurality of fields).>> Look at this egomaniac, he can't help himself, constantly self-promoting. Zeev do you look at yourself in the mirror and say "I'm one good looking guy" every day...geeez... It seems you need to express the pride you have in yourself, but it really doesn't add to the thread.. What the heck do your patents have to do with Valence Tech? Are you gonna post your resume here again? Or will you leave that to one of your lapdogs? Give it a break, practice a little humility.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10316)	4/11/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Zeev: I see you've become a lightning rod over here. The question of course is does it make sense to buy the stock here @ $7 hoping it goes to $16 with a PO or jump on board @ $11 when it starts its take off. The risk (its amazing how many people are blinded to this) is with out a PO the stock will become worthless and you MAY be able to dump it between 4 and 5. I guess there are a lot of people willing to take the 30% loss risk (and thats assuming they are quick enough to dump it) to hope for the incremental 50% gain they'll miss IF there not in the stock IF there is a PO. There are better risk / reward value plays in the market right now. Tim