Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (10103)	4/10/1999 11:53:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Larry, This is not directed to you and you may make of that as you like. First observation is that any announcement of a positive nature by GPGI will bring all sorts of creatures from under the rocks. Second observation is that a smart company would view them all not as enemies, but as potential shareholders. If we could give each what he expects and disires, then there would be lots of them. If we could define "head ore" for Richard, perhaps. I could do that, but I am not responsible here. Shame! I would be willing to bet on one thing and it is this--If Richard sees this company pulling in profits, he will forget about the "head ore" and jump in with both of his stinking feet! Clearly, that profit should have happened long ago and I hold current management fully responsible for that. With that said, let me not hold Mr. McKay responsible for the past. Since he is the only person associated with the company with any credibility, they look to him for all PR efforts. And, and, and? I for one will wait to see what happens here and surely it will come soon. I am loath to invest further as long as Jensen is in charge, but I will wait and see what McKay can do. I believe that the Oro Grande in particular has geat value and we will see if that can be harvested by current management with the help of Mr. Mckay. As for Mr. Fishbaine, I am certain that he got his information from Jensen and Twiford and believed and related what he was told. That scenario helps me to understand his frustration and loathing of present management. He, however has stated that he remains a large shareholder. This leads me to believe that he also has found value in the properties, if not current management. The bottom line is proof by production. If that can not be done, then it is as Zeev says. BTW, Zeev, your English is improving. Had to grab my dictionary for a couple of your posts! Of course, I saw through the illiterate in English thing long ago! I will bet that he can understand complex legalenglishcontracts in the blinkofaneye! All is not what it appears to be here on the internet, is it? Falling off the Turnip Truck, Jack!

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (10103)	4/11/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: Scott Wheeler	Respond to of 14226

Mr. Brubaker. Did you forget to read my post(s) all the way through? Please ask yourself - why did the following two sentences appear in my posts?: 1) << (for the benefit of the doubt, present company excepted) >> Mr. B - this means "I'm not talking about you"! 2) << On the other hand, if you were not implying that, then fine, I withdraw my indignation >> Mr. B, this means "If you say you were not calling Ed a liar, OK, say so and I withdraw my remarks. It sounded like it to me, but then you are the guy who knows how he meant the word 'misleading' to be taken". Furthermore, my phrase "vehement emotional disputatiousness" was in a letter to Zeev, not to you, and had to do with a clarifying a point that [btw] my item #1 should have made you say to yourself "Oh, he's not referring to me". I will assume that the irony is not lost on anyone here that at the beginning of this little storm I had originally set out to ask people to please stop zapping each other, so then of course now I get to human play lightning rod. Maybe instead of buzzing with stinging criticism I shoulda handed out jars of honey <vbg>.