SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clarksterh who wrote (26692)4/10/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Food Companies make 5% or so <gg> Dell @ 8%, Gorilla's should
be able to exploit their proprietary technology and achieve
very high margins. You lost me on 5% being a respectable
Profit Margin!? It's better than losing money, I guess <gg>

I'm just being sarcastic because I am not investing in QCOM
in hopes of a 7% profit margin, but I could be naive.

Company Profit Margin P/S PS/PM
CSCO 21.4% 17.5 81.8
DELL 8.2% 5.8 70.7
EMC 21.5% 15.2 70.7
INTC 27.0% 7.5 27.7
LU 15.4% 4.7 30.5
MSFT 40.0% 25.8 64.5
QCOM 5.2% 2.9 55.8
SUNW 9.4% 5.1 54.2



To: Clarksterh who wrote (26692)4/10/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: METMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Clark....just a thought on handset arguments. Firstly, I would like the Q to hold on to the handset manufacturing. Sure, we can hear the Q's quality asics in other handsets, but to become a household name, either, a) everyone has to know that it's "Digital by Qualcomm" or "Q Inside" or...b) the Q name has to be prominently displayed on the phone (as is the case for the current Q handsets made by Q. I love my QCP-2700 and get that warm/fuzzy feeling when I see the logo....stock action in recent month has helped here, I admit.

As Q has migrated from an oddity to a "global power" in communication technology, the best form of advertising is repetitive encounter...as shareholders, we need to see Q's phones all over the market or if not in the future, due to a sale, we need to see a not so subtle logo that reminds everyone who powers the handset. It's the best advertising there is....of course, we want margins, margins, margins, to continue, too.

All the best,

metman



To: Clarksterh who wrote (26692)4/10/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: MMW  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 152472
 
Hi Clark,

From MoneyCentral database, QCOM historical average profit margin is
following:

Profit Margins % Company Industry S&P 500
Gross Margin 34.9 40.9 48.0
Pre-Tax Margin 4.7 8.3 9.6
Net Profit Margin 3.4 5.3 6.8
5Yr Gross Margin (5-Year Avg.) 35.3 41.0 46.0
5Yr PreTax Margin (5-Year Avg.) 4.9 8.3 9.8
5Yr Net Profit Margin(5-Year Avg.) 3.9 5.0 6.5

Media General Industry: Communication Equipment
Computed ratios are based on latest 12 months' results

What I expect is the company to improve its profitability above the
its industrial average 5.3 to 10.6 to achieve its Gorilla status.
After all, we are investing in the company management team to expand
their revenue and net profit margin by using its technological lead
advantage in CDMA and improve share holder's value. I hope they will
be able to deliver that in the next two or three quarter time frame.

Cheers!
Mike

By the way, Dell's net profit margin is above 8%.



To: Clarksterh who wrote (26692)4/10/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
DELL for instance is about 7% net margin. What is the complaint?

DELL is a "prince", a major boxmaker that does not make the rules.

INTC, MSFT, & CSCO, are Gorillas, and make the rules for their markets. They typically run on very high margins. That is what Q should be doing now that they are dominant.