Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (28998)	4/11/1999 12:52:00 AM
From: timers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I do Mama. 100% is 100%, I know. BUT like I said earlier, I am not comfortable putting a huge amount on CYOE because a one point increase would be a large percentage, and I've seen no evidence to prove that their charade cannot go on longer. I know what has been uncovered, but would anyone have bet that they could go this long? I'm just saying I'm unsure what will happen. Shady dealings bring more shady dealings. I would put no more than a 25% position on this one until further negative developments take place. What if it goes to 12 on lies like we talked about earlier.... and it stayed there for a month before they were exposed? My money would be tied up for a month waiting. I guess the bottom line is that when I feel that they are on the verge of tanking, I'll short and then cover for a 2-3 point gain unless they get halted and go to zero. This is still a 3 point gain. There's a lot of stocks around to short for a 3 point gain. I see people on this board do it almost everyday. Granted, 3 points is 50%, but I see 25% regularly. And rather quickly. I get the feeling a lot of people are betting the farm on CYOE. It might never happen. More importantly...come Monday morning I can tell you a lot of things I'd rather short than CYOE. (e-brokers this week for one)