Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1029)	4/11/1999 2:55:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Hey, I thought it was established and unchallenged that Ballard LOST money if judged by American accounting standards? Isn't that relevent if you put companies up for comparison?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1029)	4/11/1999 7:47:00 AM
From: wpckr	Respond to of 2513

All of you detractors make some very pertinent and valid points and raise questions that we all wonder about. We thank you for your posts and your thoughtfulness. We are no more able to answer all of your questions than you are; and if we were it would take a lot of the fun out of playing this game. We have to weigh it all and make our decisions. The best choices will win a lot of money, the worst choices will lose the same dollars. That is the way of it. Someone will make a bundle out of this much needed technology. I hope we all do. Good luck!

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1029)	4/11/1999 8:35:00 AM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Good morning Francois. Your comment: ""By the way, if anyone wanted to know how much rent DCHT is paying, check the insider trading filings of the Socoloske, who are allegedly the Landlords: in round figures, $637,000 in about 9 months. "" If you are correct, and they are the landlords, that amount of rent should supply a very large or impressive building. Has anyone visited the place of business? Just noticed something else that I find a bit strange,if they are as you say, the landlords. The 144's are filed by Saul, Sharon and Fanny. I would have assumed that if they jointly owned the real estate, they would have had a registered business to which the shares could be issued to. If they are joint owners because of a close family arrangement, I would still expect that the shares would be made out to one individual, rather than three. This arrangement is surely more complex for the company, wouldn't you think? Perhaps there are very simple reasons for this that make perfect sense, I guess it could even be a tax planning, or income splitting strategy. I am not familiar with the US tax laws and am just trying to satisfy my curiosity. Can you recall where you first heard about them being the landlords? Regards, Dan