Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (3331)	4/11/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: nihil	Respond to of 17770

I think NATO (or EU) has no interest in redistributing resource ownership and no interest in impoverishing Serbia once the battle's done. Just the reverse. I think everyone agrees that general prosperity is the best friend of interethnic peace. I see little profit in trying to compensate those who have lost economically from the post-1989 loss of Kosovo autonomy, except for individual cases. Serbia and Autonomous Kosovo will both need investment and huge grants to recover and begin to grow. Significant redistribution of assets would be politically disastrous (IMHO). I'd rather see the emergency of an integrated energy community between Serbia and Kosovo run on rules consistent with eventual membership of the combined nation (Serbia (including Autonomous Kosovo), not Yugoslavia) in EU.