Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rupert1 who wrote (56949)	4/11/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Loki	Respond to of 97611

victor...good points...I agree. see my post to Captain Jack...Thought #1. Loki

To: rupert1 who wrote (56949)	4/11/1999 12:00:00 PM
From: Loki	Respond to of 97611

victor...your view, and mine might be more than what the management can execute. I like rudedog's qoute...(on his profile). Loki

To: rupert1 who wrote (56949)	4/11/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

victor--- I have found the most succes comes when only the best managers are hired promoted and retained. The most SR mgr must stay on top of things only. If he has the best working for him he needs be only a figure head with a finger on the pulse of the organization. Infighting never works and those in a power struggle need to be moved on. Those that do a great job need to be told and rewarded. Those that disappoint need to be dumped. It seems to me EM does NOT fit that catagory and EP has not seen that he received the direction or help required required but rewarded him anyway---. As both of them have failed mierably and it is almost a replay of 97 indicating they do not learn from past mistakes it is time for them to be terminated. If they worked for you and did this type of thing TWICE would you pay them milions to hang on and do it again??