Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ABER RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WillP who wrote (1295)	4/11/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2006

Excellent discussion. I've got a question re WSP being fully valued (or should I say "re Aber's interest in Snap Lake being fully valued" for the folks who complain about seeing Snap Lake being discussed here?). I look at it this way, if the bulk sample comes back as per the MRDI scoping study, WSP is grossly undervalued. If the bulk comes back below, say, US$150, WSP is grossly overvalued. And one other item- it seems GT's allegation that there are only 3.5 mil tonnes proven is a stretch. Maybe, if you're dotting every "i" and crossing every "t" you could technically say that, but is there anyone out there willing to bet that there's less than 14 million tonnes of similar grade kimberlite there? If so, I'll gladly wager with you.

To: WillP who wrote (1295)	4/11/1999 4:20:00 PM
From: Taylor Mill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2006

WillP "You are clearly not addressing your remarks at me. " You are correct --- the remarks were not addressed to you nor to any one specific individual; instead to those who seem to relish the thought of Winspear succeeding at the implied expense of Aber. Yes I agree with your comment -- if ABER fails to get government approvals that will be a negative affecting everyone. Hopefully those who would benefit from my comments regarding success for everyone and your comments pointing out the downside of a governmental rejection will read them and think before they make more posts of the same ilk we have seen in the past days.

To: WillP who wrote (1295)	4/11/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: George J. Tromp	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2006

I do recall multiple pipe emplacements A-21, discovered before 154S, and 154N. Or did that slip your mind as well. The point being is sufficent tonnage was implied prior to Abers mini-bulk sample onset. Delineation holes have a way of sort of outlining the parameters of a pipe. As I recall, the A-21 was discovered around the same time that the 154S was discovered, I guess one could say Aber was armed with multiple pipe emplacements going into the mini-bulk samples. Winspear by the way had 1.4 mil tons and prospects for more, with 75% of the value lying in 3 stones. Personally it isnt a risk reward relationship I would urge on anyone at current prices. In light of the Aber allegations, I am sure the attorneys will shed more light on the case as it unfolds. Thus far I would expect to see Winspear refuting the statement of claim made by Aber which is due around the 15 of April. 1999. We will see how open Winspear is up to full disclosure, I have requested a full copy. If not I will be contacting the courts for a copy as well. Thanks Mr. Mill, glad to see a few have benefited from my imput. Visit my website when you have a chance, I usually post most of the relevant press releases from various companies on the message boards. Have a nice Day George