Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (34764)	4/12/1999 4:55:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, first one comment to your post. << As to the MAXAM/IPM takeover?, this may have been a dog and pony show to get yours and others $10,000 kitties into the bag as well. >> If so, then I and those other ipmcf shareholders, including ALL the ipmcf shareholders that took an active role in the shareholders activity to call a special shareholders meeting thru collecting of the share pledging, were honest and trueful and then con'ed by those on the other side of the merger. TO REPEAT WHAT YOU SAID: << may have been >> At this point no information has been identified except individuals speculation on a possible IPM scam. The information I know to be true and accurate is that the ipmcf shareholders activity switched from obtaining a special shareholders meeting because an opportunity arose for a possible Maxam merger, and in good faith, for the best outcome for ipmcf shareholders, the ipmcf shareholders activity decided to pursue this avenue. No <<dog and pony>> or any other con or scam on shareholders activity side thru any ipmcf shareholders active in the undertaking. If any "dog and pony or any other con or scam" existed elsewhere, I have NO information as to that. As for what you mentioned, SEC and class action and the like, I again ask you to read my post again. If the ipmcf shareholders, those currently holding ipmcf shares, do not participate in any future monetary rewards from the Black Rock dirt, then I as an individual will obtain for myself the reasons for the such outcome. My purpose will not be to try and reclaim my investment, or inflicted duress by others, but to see that "bad persons are not allowed to do bad and get away with it". For me its not a money thing. If things were done to "prevent" ipmcf shareholders from realizing the dream they had for their investment here, then things can be done to prevent those who prevented the shareholders. Criminal and illegal acts need not have been comitted, just as criminal and illegal actions need not be needed to do another "prevent" to the side that first did what was done to prevent ipmcf shaeholders. This thread may exist for another 99 years, in limbo, along with the limbo of Black Rock, and its "other" owners also put in limbo Doug