Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (34479)	4/12/1999 1:31:00 AM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Are you suggesting that there are Christian sects who do not accept the Old Testament as part of the Bible? Everybody knows, Christians and non-Christians alike, that the Bible is made up of two parts -- the Old Testament and the New Testament. That does NOT mean that all Christian denominations (nicer word than sects) "accept" the Old Testament in the sense of viewing the whole thing as the Word of God, as prescribing behavior or beliefs that they as Christians must follow, or anything of that sort. Heck, there are Christians who do not "accept" all of the NEW Testament, either. For example, except for fundamentalists, almost everyone regards Revelations as a crock. Chuzzlewit, you puzzle me...Haven't you ever met any Unitarians??? And to what are you referring here? I was surprised at your comment about the irrelevance of what Jesus actually said. Where did I ever say anything about "irrelevance"? Joan