To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (57103 ) 4/12/1999 6:11:00 AM From: rupert1 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
El: I read somewhere, that DELL had troubles with re-sellers similar to COMPAQ's when it was converting from indirect to direct, and that during the height of the transition it nearly went under. DELL is having to go back to mixed channel again, to some degree, especially outside the US. I think the adjustments are difficult - for COMPAQ to direct and for DELL to more mixed - and I think there has been an effective boycott of COMPAQ products by some re-sellers this last quarter as a revenge measure. The white boxes - not DELL - has benefitted. Re-sellers were happier in the last two weeks of March after they got their extra percentage points from COMPAQ, but this probably creamed off that profit that COMPAQ needed to make up some of the earlier shortfall. However, if the resellers continue to be happy it should maintain market share and recover some of the lost sales even if profit will continue to be a struggle. Re-sellers will also have to learn that COMPAQ cannot go on spoon-feeding them, COMPAQ has to cut its costs. Personally, I still don't buy the Kumar analysis that it is all company specific. So he was more right about the earnings shortfall, but still 20-25% wrong. But his luck at throwing a dart wearing a blindfold doesn't make him a prophhet. If you had followed Kumar in the last quarter, even on COMPAQ - let alone some of his other stocks - you would be in a heavily losing position. A few weeks ago, he had COMPAQ as a buy when it was in the $40's and saw the downside at $35. He still had it as a BUY after he predicted earnings of 20 and thought that all his gloom amd doom still justified $30+ as a buying price, despite his talk of "dead money" at $24 on Friday evening.