Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (25177)	4/12/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Both are great stocks ( MveryHO) but TSIG does have a much larger market. PatT.com :>) I own both

To: Dave Gore who wrote (25177)	4/12/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Dave...bad analogy...and mistake in market strategy of PNLK.. PNLK is forming alliances with different country's Chambers of Commerce to get members to sign up as large groups....Israel may alone provide 10,000 members. Individual sign-ups are the creme on the top. PNLK also is recogniziably as an unique portal model difficult to emulate because of its alliances with names people recognize. PNLK also has a much ballyhooed Version release at the end of this week with planned media coverage. PNLK is a start-up w/o the baggage of restructuring PNLK is NOT FULLY REPORTING....no one ever had the opportunity to read the gory details of PNLK's pp.. PNLK is a GREAT investment... Now take a look at JNNE...a stock that is also flying...I asked questions on that board that weren't answered. JNNE has 62 mill OS , 100 mil authorized and 40+mil in the float. JNNE product and market strategy is not unique. There are a ton of other companies that are providing interactive kiosks in public places. MTSI is a very interesting opportunity (10.9 p/e with 30% growth) JNNE doesn't have a lot of alliances or even the management in place. JNNE's news releases are pretty junky or "fluffy" non-news... JNNE also isn't reporting...financial info can't be confirmed...no one on the thread knows why share count doubled or exactly how revenues are being generated. I could also use GTCI as an example.. Point is with these comparisons...Non reporting companies give people more opportunity to speculate on what they "believe" than what may necessarily be. The otc-bb is for high risk speculation. The more there is to speculate about, the more people speculate in these companies. TSIG, like another fully reporting company I like DIXS, has only shattered people's "illusions" with being forthright... However, in the long run, both TSIG and DIXS will most likely be much more successful companies than those that are not currently reporting..(PNL will do well though IMO).. By June 2000 when all otc-bb's have to be reporting...the landscape will drastically change. Now more points regarding TSIG People don't fully understand TSIG. Many don't understand that TSIG is an intergrated e-commerce/teleservices/development company and not just an e-tailor. People don't understand how the b-model makes , protects, and generates revenue from its different divisions. People don't understand the marketing strategy and how it is completely different from the "volume" strategy of making money from website advertising. TSIG is fully reporting with plenty of dirty laundry . TSIG is not a start-up. TSIG is re-structuring and carrying the debt load of this restructuring.....old baggage.. TSIG's contracts are not with house hold "techie" names. People don't understand and won't understand the arrangements with the BR LEague and LifeLong learning until they see revenues let alone earnings. Now if one of TSIG's divisions strcuk a deal with one of the high tech big boys like MSFT, AOL, NSCP, YHOO or DELL ..then TSIG will most likely be instantaneously recognized IMO...However, that is a big "if" and the name "Signature" doesn't quite carry the same clout with investors.... Or, in other words....... THIS IS A MATTER OF PERCEPTION...NOT ONE OF VALUE... Heck though...isn't that what it is all about anyway...perceived value?? Sincerely, z ......(spelling not checked)