SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (29520)4/12/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I think if you study the historical valuations of AMAT versus NVLS, you are likely to find a profitable and relatively risk free way construct a pair trade between the two.

Sun Tzu



To: Paul V. who wrote (29520)4/12/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Respond to of 70976
 
From a fundamental standpoint, CSCO and other electronics OEMs tend to benefit from the same forces (overcapacity, falling prices, etc.) that hurt chipmakers and equipment suppliers. I see these companies as having more growth potential and more pricing power than the boxmakers, at least for the short term. Still, it's all electronics, and anything that seriously damps the computer technology sector (macroeconomics, regulation/taxation of the Internet, Internet bubble bursting, etc.) is likely to hurt these guys, too. If it were my money and I were looking for an alternative to AMAT I might look further afield: drug companies and biotech research if you still want technology, or maybe the services sector.

At the same time, I think it's premature to be talking about the end of the current upcycle. From a business standpoint, I think we're still close to the bottom. I don't expect the Real (tm) revenue growth to start happening until late 1999, and it should keep going for at least a year or two after that.

Disclaimer: it's not my money, and since I never bought AMAT I don't care about an AMAT exit strategy.

Katherine



To: Paul V. who wrote (29520)4/12/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Paul, even though most stocks have seen their bottom, try oil service.
First, subscribe to Mike Simmons' free newsletter.

loosbrock.com

Gottfried