Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (78612)	4/12/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: Srini	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>>>The spin afterwards on the comments made during the cc will establish Intel's current valuation.<<< Mary: Here's the spin put out already by Cramer (who seems to change his tune almost daily)... "corporate America and maybe corporate Europe bought a ton of personal computers to get Y2K-compliant last year. Looks like that buying has been done." In the Compaq Fallout, Looking for Winners By James J. Cramer 4/10/99 12:00 PM ET Look at it this way. At one point my partner, Jeff Berkowitz, thought World War III was about to break out in the Balkans. I don't care how many puts you have, you're not protected from that event. Still, the Compaq (CPQ:NYSE) news will cause a tremendous bout of handwringing about the true state of the personal computer business. I have my own theories about what is really going on. (You can take them with a grain of salt, given that I have puts on Compaq, or you can take them as visionary, because I have puts on Compaq.) First, Compaq, the Compaq we all know and love, left us years ago. This Compaq is a company without a soul that seems to be all things to all people. It pays for Digital Equipment and gets who knows what. It is buying Web companies. It has some search engine (AltaVista) through DEC that I thought was worth a lot, but maybe now that is wrong. It is the higher-cost maker of computers. It is not well-run. Second, people love cheap appliance-like personal computers. People want fast Web access. They don't want all of the other gizmos that come in a $2,000 machine. Compaq has too many high-end machines. Third, corporate America and maybe corporate Europe bought a ton of personal computers to get Y2K-compliant last year. Looks like that buying has been done. These problems are all peculiar to that subset of tech which is personal computers. They do not extend to the Web, or to networking, or to bandwidth, the prevailing themes that were working in the market. They do extend to semiconductors, disk drives and adapter cards. One could argue that Compaq's statement means a price war that will stimulate sales. But to whom will those profits accrue? Maybe only Microsoft (MSFT:Nasdaq), which makes good money per every computer sold. For me, it will be business as usual. For example, I hope they take Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq), which I am long, down on this. I want them to take America Online (AOL:NYSE) down on this. They aren't losers because of this, and they may end up to be winners. Forgive me for being a pollyanna, but I am trying to make money.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (78612)	4/12/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, RE:<<What I can't understand is the vehemence of all those without a financial interest in Intel's fortunes, who appear on this thread and spend an enormous amount of time and ingenuity highlighting and creating negative news - a lot of which is outright false or somehow transparent in their desire to see Intel investor lose money.>> Dunno if you were referring to me or not, but FWIW, I do not spend that much time or ingenuity highlighting Intel news (that's probably pretty apparent); I usually just comment when I think that my perspective might have something to offer. True, I don't have a financial interest in Intel's fortunes, but this thread is still invaluable for me. Understanding Intel and its universe is essential in understanding just about any equity in technology, and this thread contains much more useful information than any related thread, with much less of the silly irrelevance that can tend to infect SI. The day trading ranting in the DELL thread gets old quick ("DELL is up a point!!!Go DELL!!!"). Whether any Intel investor makes or loses money is irrelevant to me.