SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ruyi who wrote (19359)4/12/1999 4:49:00 PM
From: Muwamba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz



To: Ruyi who wrote (19359)4/12/1999 4:49:00 PM
From: Sulayman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
helloo Dagan, how is your vacation coming along?



To: Ruyi who wrote (19359)4/12/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: Muwamba  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
THAT SCREW GOMEZ ON CNBC!!! idiot



To: Ruyi who wrote (19359)4/12/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: ysell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
If he actually said what is alleged, he is alleged to have said that revenues may be lower than projected, but that net earnings/(loss) should be consistent with forecast (i.e., read improved margins). Nevertheless, I'm not certain that revenue numbers are material. Whether the Company's revenues are $10 mm, $20 mm or $50 mm is of little consequence. People are buying into a concept. If you like the concept or believe that NASDAQ (Europe, B2B, etc.) provides significant upside potential, then buy the Company. If not, don't. But immaterial revenue fluctuations are not what is going to drive the price of this or most internet companies (if the past is any precedent). Revenues fluctuations may have a short term impact, but significant news items are of more consequence (like it or not). If you are analyzing the financial performance of these companies, its hard to rationalize the market caps. But if believe in the concept, well, invest away and hold tight.



To: Ruyi who wrote (19359)4/12/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: mccowaner  Respond to of 37507
 
I believe I saw the post, too (regarding an analyst who stated BII's income will not rise) however, I also think it was a Canadian analyst. Am I correct ??