Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Sound Works (SOWK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T A P who wrote (531)	4/12/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Tom	Respond to of 582

TAP.... and maybe you can start acting a little more professional too....leave KG4 out of it please...thanks.

To: T A P who wrote (531)	4/13/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 582

I did receive 3 more responses from SOWK this morning. In a nutshell, I find it curious that they told me they don't even know how to get to Silicon Investors, let alone monitor the site. Yet TAP has stated many times that SOWK was well aware of these happenings are would not sit still. They also told me they don't care if people talk about the company, yet TAP has been throwing around these veil threats in an effort to disuade negative posting. SOWK also told me they forwarded an email to you...thats it....nobody else. And I believe them. So, TAP, where is this e-mail I sent to Money made that you alledged how many times I sent to him to post on raging bull. Let me ask you something...you posted all over the place that I am with this sleazy group you mention...you then post this crap about the e-mail...now, listen bud...it wasn't just a simple 1 post thing...you posted over and over again accusing me of sending an e-mail to money made to post on raging bull in an effort to hurt you or the company. Pretty serious stuff......seems you could earn a little credibility by proving this. I mean...c'mon chief...this is your moment...seriously...to either prove me a whacko head case and ruin any credibility I ever had, while cementing your credibility even more. Why would you not do this....? If it were me or anyone else begging for someone to prove them wrong, and they could do it...surely they would. You enjoy playing this game with me ...I mean, this little post you posted was simply meant to try and antagonize me....Here's the deal......You can prove your credibility and post this private e-mail or you can not do it and make up some lame excuse, and you will have answered the question on your credibility to everybody. Ya know what I think...and this is just my humble opinion of course. I don't think there was a private e-mail posted by money made. I think you saw the post he copied from this thread and got confused. Again, this is just my guess, but if I am right....man, oh man.......I don't think my 3 year old nephew could mess up that bad....a public post ..posted within the last week on a financial investement board is mistaken for a private e-mail sent to a private company ????? If this is the case...it tells an awful lot about you........ Lastly...I do apologize for posting again...I did converse with the company and thought I would let you folks know that SOWK seems intent on ignoring this crap and concentrating on their business at hand and creating a succesful company. It is a shame a certain stock promoter can't do the same...this person has been in battle with me...and how many others, when he should be concentrating on helping, not harming his clients. As a professional, you show a complete lack of class.......every time I try and end this...you try and goad me into continuing...proof positive is this post I am responding to. I am gone from here...but you found it necessary to post about me..knowing I would respond. Now you'll come back with some response saying that I said I would not respond anymore...but here I am...It's all a game to you. I contact you privately...you blow me off and accuse me publicly of not contacting you privately....it's all a game...when it should be a business. I asked for your legal representative information...you would not give it to me....I said privately lets end this...you post publicly continuing it.....it's all a game and I hope your having fun. Understand this TAP....if you want me gone...cease and decist posting about me. Simple as that. Most people on this thread would like to see this thread get back to some kind of normalcy. I feel bad for the shareholders of this company that have to wade thru this...but I will defend myself...simple as that...if you insist on posting about me...lying about me.....goading me into a fight..I, like anybody else, will respond. You got that ? You want me gone from here ? Then forget I ever existed and you'll never see me post here again. Can you do that ? Can you end this...??? It's all up to you. You want me gone from here and your the only one that can get rid of me and all you have to do is not post to me or about me in any matter way or form. Lets see if you can accomplish this. And again, for the people I offend with this off topic post, I apologize, but you too would post if meant your integrity. Nobody is going to sit back and watch some %&**%^%, run around lying about them and goading them into battle. Good luck to all LONG SOWK shareholders......Although I am not in agreeance with their promoter, I do like the potential of the company.... KG

To: T A P who wrote (531)	4/13/1999 10:53:00 AM
From: Green Receipt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 582

Hi TAP, I wrote the company yesterday because I as a shareholder wasn't happy with your performance here. To make a long story short, I found out the truth about your connection with SOWK. I would appreciate it TAP if you would cease harassing others on this thread. The topic of this thread is about SOWK not about your performance. You should go start a thread somewhere else and then fight your battles there. The intent of this thread is solely on SOWK. PS: anyone else wishing to find the truth can do so by directly contacting company representatives.