Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ICHG - iChargeIt Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: antibash who wrote (220)	4/12/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 347

yeah—let's move it elsewhere. And if you really believe what you just wrote, give me a hit off that and share with the rest, wouldja? <g> PS: Isn't Karen Valentine a shareholder in this company? 222 <gg>

To: antibash who wrote (220)	4/13/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 347

severe problems do exist for the defendants. Please list and describe those "severe problems", with reference to, and excerpts from, the transcripts. I don't, of course, believe you've got a copy. If you do: prove it. With numerous posts, clear examples, good annotation. <snicker>

To: antibash who wrote (220)	4/13/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 347

Knowing how far you are from a REAL source, explains your lack of understanding the true consequence of a short. Auntie??? How many times do I have to explain? We DID, after all, post the DTC sheets. We can do it again, if you like. There is no current net short position in AZNT. What's your problem understanding this? It's very simple. Sure, Mikey "wants" to cancel more than 9.5 million shares of stock. Well, good luck to him: so far not a single share's been poofed. Anzi, as we say here: more paper's been issued since Mikey decided to play transfer agent. How MUCH more? I'd love to know...