To: bill meehan who wrote (32900 ) 4/12/1999 11:58:00 PM From: John Pitera Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 86076
Prominent bears in the 1920's as well as the 1990's--From a colleague However, one of the great popular misconceptions about the late-1920s > mania and pre-crash period was that there were no bears around and > that the rabid bullishness was the greatest contrarian indicator of > the century. > > Some of the more notable bears of the time, who sold quite early or > who publicly proclaimed there bearishness were Charles Merrill, Joseph > P. Kennedy, Bernard Baruch, Paul Warburg (the "father" of the U.S. > Federal Reserve), the infamous Jesse Livermore, the misunderstood and > mischaracterized Herbert Hoover (as Secretary of Commerce in the > Coolidge administration), Henry Ford, the "real' Roger Babson, and an > extensive list of less notable bankers, media executives, politicians, > writers, and foreign dignitaries. > > Today, an examination of the incomplete list is interesting, as many > of the individuals who personally experienced the crash are quite > bearish, some of whom have characterized the current stock market > situation a bubble: John Kenneth Galbraith, Sir John Templeton, Roy > Neuberger, Walter Morgan,founder of the Vanguard Wellington fund > (recently deceased), Phil Caret (likewise recently passed on), Phil > Fisher (whom I met when I lived in San Mateo, CA. in the early-1990s), > Milton Friedman (recently quoted as stating that the current bubble is > larger than the one in 1929), Elliot Janeway (now deceased), and > Albert Sindlinger, an economist in the Hoover administration, who has > operated his own consumer confidence survey from Pennsylvania since > the 1950s. > > I would even include Warren Buffet as being bearish, at least as as he > can publicly be bearish, given Wall Street's habit of watching his > every move and reacting to even his most cheeky utterance. > > Lest I forget the single most important person in my life for shaping > my view of economics, history, philosophy, finance, and geopolitics, > my dear grandfather, who became increasingly bearish in 1995-96 with > each tick up on the DJIA until his death in his 90s in late-1997. > > These persons' perspective are certainly not the final word on the > subject, and while I am not a historical determinist, per se, I am not > one to subscribe to the post-modernist notion that "history is dead" > and that U.S. history is the province of "dead, white males" and an > anathema to our understanding of today's world. > >