SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (78666)4/13/1999 1:18:00 AM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, Re: 3. If you want to save money on the CPU and graphics card, buy a K6-2 system with 3DNow! which provides most of the same
benefits for games as SSE.

Please, you can stick to your opinions about AMD whatever you
want but this seems to be a bit too much. Almost all game benchmark
I saw indicates that no real games take advantage of 3DNow.

You are, IMHO, giving false information.

The same can be said for SSE too, at this moment. But the chances that
future games will support SSE rather than 3DNow is much greater.

Gary



To: Scumbria who wrote (78666)4/13/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
There you go again, Scumbria, posting without thinking. You said, "If you want to save money on the CPU and graphics card, buy a K6-2 system with 3DNow! which provides most of the same benefits for games as SSE." But Tom's Hardware Guide clearly shows that even for games with 3DNow support, even a Celeron 400 ($110) beats a K6-III 450 ($450):

www4.tomshardware.com

(This was with a Riva TNT card. A test with the not-yet-released Voodoo3 3500 shows the K6-III 450 about 1.3 fps faster than a Celeron 400, but that's still a very poor advantage.)

Tenchusatsu