Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TrueScouse who wrote (34807)	4/13/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 35569

Howard, <<But they varied from hole to hole>> Now that you mention it, I remember that too. However, the grade touted was ~0.03-0.05, not enough to overcome the mining costs. What I have are comments from Dale Runyon who sold IPM their property. He said that IPM had a good property. It was in his interest to have IPM succeed for lots of reasons. IPM management attacked this problem like conventional hard rock guys and blew it. Look at what MGAU is now reporting.

To: TrueScouse who wrote (34807)	4/13/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Josephus	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Howdy Howy! Nor could I resist chiming in to say hello to all my fellow "experienced" investors. Does anyone have a clue as to when it will most likely be all over so we can finally write it off? Regards, JadedJody_/)_