Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ibexx who wrote (78872)	4/13/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: S. Chiang	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

>> Pay no attention to afterhours, especially when the trade sizes were relatively small. << The last afterhours trade was 50,000 shares at 57 3/4. I don't think 50K is relatively small! What do you think?

To: Ibexx who wrote (78872)	4/13/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: Imuah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ibexx, how do you account for a 50,000 share block that traded at 57 3/4? That's hardly small and it's not all over the place. It's in one spot...57 3/4.

To: Ibexx who wrote (78872)	4/13/1999 6:13:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ibexx, I generally pay little attention to after-hours trading regardless of the volumes. I've been involved with this before, and it's a really different game. Very limited number of players, and played mostly as a "cat and mouse" kind of a game, or a game of chicken. Who's going to hit whose price? When? How will it move? Will it move enough? Will you get in and out? Cramer described this better than I ever could, just last week: thestreet.com or his weekend re-write: thestreet.com mg

To: Ibexx who wrote (78872)	4/13/1999 6:20:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Respond to of 186894

Ibexx,>>>Pay no attention to afterhours<<< I agree. If it weren't for 5fer's bs blaming of PC demand for his wretched performance and subsequent mindless reporting by CNBC (impacted no doubt by 5fer - and especially Joe Kernan's clueless interview with Drew Peck) 1Q results were very much in line with Management's guidance. We are on track for ~36% 1999 earnings growth and 1999 revenue growth of ~15%. Nothing has changed from realistic expectations. EARNINGS PER SHARE Quarters 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 MAR 0.2550 0.255 0.5500 0.360 0.570 JUN 0.2475 0.295 0.4600 0.330 0.540 est SEP 0.2625 0.370 0.4400 0.445 0.600 est DEC 0.2450 0.530 0.4900 0.585 0.640 est Totals 1.0100 1.450 1.9400 1.720 2.350 est REVENUE Quarters 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 MAR 3,557 4,644 6,448 6,001 7,100 JUN 3,894 4,621 5,960 5,927 7,000 est (Notice seasonal patterns) SEP 4,171 5,142 6,155 6,731 7,500 est DEC 4,580 6,440 6,507 7,614 8,400 est Totals 16,202 20,847 25,070 26,273 30,000 est