SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silkroad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (347)4/14/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: GrokSoup  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 626
 
Jeff Kagan is a nice fellow, but he self-admittedly is not a photonics guy. Given the complexity of the SilkRoad technology -- and it (and SilkRoad's baffling explanations) are very complex -- his opinion is worth darn close to zero.

Instead, what he is saying what everyone else is saying: If it works, it will be great. That's true, but it's also entirely unhelpful.

A while back I was doing some research on SilkRoad and I got a photonics expert at a top university involved. While what he wrote me was private, I don't think he'd mind me sharing some general comments on one the company's central research papers:

- the problem is not well defined; it appears to be something to do with the design of an optical modulator that accepts light from a polarization maintaining (PM) input fiber

- the problem outlined above is straightforward. It does not throw into doubt the fundamental equations of physics, as the author implies, nor does it require some re-interpretation of dearly held physical concepts.

- the paper is full of mistakes, conceptual difficulties, etc. For example, the modulation of an optical beam is through the electro-optic effect, and is proportional to the electric field, not the magnetic field, as he states

- the paper would have zero chance of being accepted in any of the reputable optics journals, for example the Journal of the Optical Society of America.

P.