SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nuke44 who wrote (42252)4/13/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: JBL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
< Because of that, I don't expect them to back off until Milosevic's military has been reduced to a smoldering wreck and even the most biased anti-NATO observers won't be able to claim that the Serbs achieved even a pyrrhic victory.>

How do you reconcile this view with the fact that NATO refuses to even admit it is at war with Serbia, and that Russia is being solicited with such fervor ?

Everything I hear in Europe tends to indicate that NATO is positioning itself to negotiate with Milosevic, and that fractures are starting to appear in the coalition.

I agree that once it had started, stopping the operation to soon and not escalating would have been a screw up. But stopping too late, given Milosevic's die hard attitude, and the political dimension of the crisis, may have even more disastrous effects. Let's hope for the best.




To: nuke44 who wrote (42252)4/14/1999 8:41:00 AM
From: Ish  Respond to of 67261
 
Sounds like you have a neat tee shirt, one that you can be proud of.

<<The sad truth is, Milosevic had a chance to stop the hostilities even after they had started by backing down and allowing NATO it's symbolic victory and ceasing it's oppression of the Kosovar Albanians. >>

Sadder still, NATO had a chance last weekend to slow this thing down and bring some sanity to it. But no. When Milosevic took a step back NATO doubled it's efforts. Now the Serbs have stepped up their attacks and expanded them. This is going to snowball into one hell of a mess. I have heard reports some of the Albanians are blaming the US for the increase in the killings.



To: nuke44 who wrote (42252)4/14/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: Stormweaver  Respond to of 67261
 
The Libya attack was directly responsible for the Pan Am Lockerbie bombing that followed. Was that stupid little attack worth the lives of 270 innocent civilians ?

Also your correct about NATO, now with 1000 planes, it appears to external observers that the U.S. is too chicken to go into Yugoslavia and save the alleged slaughtering of Albanians until Yugoslavia is has been bombed into a giant crater.