Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (29939)	4/14/1999 8:48:00 AM
From: steviee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Flodyie, did you see post #29832?

To: StockDung who wrote (29939)	4/14/1999 9:10:00 AM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Lets not forget another thing. CDO padded their own earnings with those three lease deals with CYOE. We all know about Eugene Curcio and the P.O. Box. CDO owned 6.6% of CYOE stock. They benefited, they manipulated. They helped CYOE's fraudulent press releases. They had a chance when Eugene Curcio was exposed. They never mentioned the two other deals with CYOE. Maybe you can invite Jack Slevin to are thread so we can get the truth instead of the many lies the public has been given. If Curcio was not exposed it would be business and market manipulation as usual at CDO and CYOE. Maybe he can tell us why Allan Andreini had to give up control of the shares that CDO controlled of CYOE stock two days after the street.com broke the story? Why did Andreini and Slevin resign one day before the 13g was filed on 6.6% ownership of CYOE stock? Go eat a bug!! Floyd

To: StockDung who wrote (29939)	4/14/1999 9:45:00 AM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

All this CYOE information is of no importance to me. I'm sure it's relevant in some way to many, but all I pointed out was that the retirement of Slevin's was planned for years. It should be rather obvious. Ken Pontikes died and Nick Pontikes was left controlling over 25% of the stock. If you look at Pontikes' climb up the corporate ladder it can be seen that he was being groomed for years to step in, effecting a rather seamless change. What I am pointing out, is Coyote or no Coyote the retirement was a done deal years ago. I know this for a fact but as I say, if you looked at the ascent of Pontikes plus took into account his majority control you would have seen it coming quite some time ago. My relationship to Slevin is of no importance; other than a few thousand shares of stock that I have for well over 10 years I have no other interest in the company nor have I now or in the past any information of a material nature EDIT Go eat a bug? Look as long as you can't control yourself I won't bother to respond any longer.