SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Birch Mountain Resources BMD-ASE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Devlin who wrote (86)4/14/1999 2:00:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Respond to of 402
 
Heck with Market Maker Games, it is really a question of THEORY and APPLICATION, is BMD and our Arizona Favorites doing this thru understanding of what might be, or on one of a here and now, let's shave some pints at the Bid, the ask is the quesation in our future:
Half way down I added some words with my name as questions, statements and as commentary in between the bad scanning...:
""<<..THE GREAT BASIN GOLD DISCOVERY
By Bob Barefoot, July 6, 1994

A new and 'abundant of goid has been discovered. The gold occurs as sulfate salt-encapsultated micron gold. ln naturc ti ts found in hematite (hydrated iron oxide) sand, but it can also be found in the sulfide tailings of copper and gold ores. It has remained hidden from man's fire assay gold gold analysis as the acid salt reacts with the sodium carbonate the fire assay flux to generate large volumes of carbon dioxide gas whiich propel the encapsulated gold as a froth to the top of the assay cup which it cannot be entrapped by the ccouring lead in the flux. It lead in theilux ( known as "acid slag effect" in assay and mining journalss ). The encapsulation blocks the gold frpm vision, as well as...causing numerous analytical difficulties. However, once salt has been removed ( Patent Pending) the gold is assayable by Certified Fire Assay!
Note- Rest of scan is messed upo

~or decades bttndnedt of ~ate~ ~ labo~tones" all over the daoial dtaina~ ~ ~~yen'ng ~ of the lo~ ~tates of ~tah~~1jIOrni~ ~cvu~di and Anzont
'The G1eal Btain ) have been ~ 5~h hematite ore ~LSt~
~ ~~oc~e$ and ~ of gold that We~ ~ beyond the tetlm of crtd'bility. The profCSsio~~~ on tics eou~d not ~ the wo~ ~tng the tied and ~~ven ee~fied fl~ ~y, and tlt~ dismiSSed all auch clairns as l(aud'11~~~ The aLzLhOt. apolo~~UY ·d£ni.ts to being part of the igr~~~I't clorus. Act~lly, the ~OCCd~5 ~sed by ~ of the ~ laos wt!C ~~~ives of the totaby acctpt~ble ~ of ~ ~ and c~pel foY two ~ ~ umas the as~Y ~~blern$ ca~~ by acid slag ate well 6oco~~ed tn both assay and ~ining jou~L The r~ that thi p[Uf~i~ ~mtnUfltty ~ ~~bie to the high ~ was ihat neithe~ ~y~or thei~ atnate~ ~ ~ the probLem and. theT~fort, did not 1~5~an~ ~ the ~ ~ with dthydrat~ Wt~ioh inC~CS~~~t ~ipj~tion and ~ ~ the pr~blctn ef time i.. ~~ng ~ onett has leren ~~ognized~ and the teml ~ scnsit'Ve ore' has been coined.

~ofetsio~l ~ologisls reiect the cl~detti,,,ne)ab. Ii, ~ding$ for, the followhug rtasons:

Professional Geologists reject the clandestine lab findings for the Following reasons:

l They are unable to verify the results with third party fire assays.
2. They are unable to duplicate the results with the same procedure in third party labs.

I see some interesting things here to the April First PR-NR.Chuca

3, They arc u~blCto ~~ethC ~~ld with ftflelec~n ~iOrOscoP~.
4 ~ ~de of the gold in ea~h deposit ti al~vays t~hi~to be explained hy an'Y knoWn ~1O~L~l CItou1~~'
5 The thickneSs and artal e'ctettt of each depostt is so v~t that the rtSCf~et ~mplitd by ~cn ~posit wOuLd ~ th, cur~~~r16 gold rcScTVeS elteady ntj~d.
6. Other professionals, analysts, and metallurgists agree with their conclusions.
7' No one has ever yet sucessfully mined such deposits.
ice. and that once again thc '9experts" are wrong. ~owever. this ice age i~ not the one that is belic"od to have created the massiv$ hematite ~old deposits. The geological Pleistocene era which created the Great Basin arbd which ended 30,000 y~ars ago, is believed t( be responsible for the nuinerous and massive gold deposits

The tirst question thAt ~ust be ari5~~d is whe~ did all of the gold come from '? The ~lvgist only has explanations for deposits o~ly a tiny fraction of the sizt of the hematite depo5i~ Th~s uripublished explanations must be postulated. To begin ~vith,
~ know thaI gold conieS from the molten bowels of the ~vth Most of the massive ~ld deposits known today exist thousands of feet below the surface in Pre~ambr'an Rock (over 500,000,000 years old). The real question to be answ~red is how did such a massive amount of s~h gold"eriii'chcd l're-Ga~briin rock end up on the ~urface as he~atite sand? Wbcn we look today at the most rn~ive surface deposit of gold that is lcnown to exist today, we are looking at the Carlin trend which was produced by a massive fault, which h~~6 the lower Pre~ambrian Ore ~ the surf~ce, and then flipped over (ow' its belly) exposi~ all of the ore at the surface. Any laytnan would expect that what has proven to h~ppea once geologically, must have happ~ned rrLany tin~es ~f6re. Then whe~ arc the oth~ Carlins?

Lets suppose, just for the sake of argtunent. that hundreds of Carl~ns e~isted in the northeni United States and Car'~ in pr~~glacial tiinCs. When the glaciers came, they would have ~ound up th~sc carb~type ~posits. The amo~ of ice wa£ so rt~assive that it lowered the surface of the oCeVis aboL[t 650 feet. Thus when this utassive amount of ice melted, it [eleased oceans of water, which w~ trapped by the mountain ranges in the westein United States This forc~ the tlLrbuient flow (~ water mnd gold bearing Pa~ Cambria~i rock debris to pass into the Great ~asin creatin~ huge lakes. The flowing water flushed the lighter mjn~~lg so~h into Mexico and the Pacific ocea~.

The next question to be answered is how did a granitic Pre-Cambric Rock end up as a hematite sand? The answer lies in the science of mineral diagenesis which is a FANCY name for the "Study of how minerals are altered when exposed to the changing environrnents of nature." If a gold-rich granitic rock is ground up in the laboratory and flushed with a large volume of water for several years, the result would be a hematite residue containing gold.
Chuca would call this akin to Paleo Channel Tech of the XRAL SGS Lavalin Group aka :
mmigeochem.com
WHAT I CALL MMI- sand channels.....Sediments explained 101-202
EOM no more editing...advise if Bobs Phone Number in Arizona is wanted...by PM or chucalo@aol.com
... the defect scanning continues...This is the DCRS - differential Charged Theory that was the start for many of us to UNDERSTAND the Models of the needed study...even the STUDY of a Brine in the Prairie golde Model - of Birch Mountain - I can not wait for the recap at that Wednesday MEETING...a week from taoday!
The octehedral micno~~ gold would have been liberated ~m the ~ulfides ~s th~y oxidized, under water, into sulfate~. and the res~ltirt~ sulfuric acid would have reac'.~d ~jih the caibonates to liberate the calcium The re~u!t would be a positively .~urface charged octahednI gold crystal being ~urround~d by the ~egatively charged '~alf~te ion v/hich subse~uently attracts the positively c~~r~cd calcium ion, resulting In the c'i.capsulation by prec2p*:tation of calcium ~ulfat~ ar~und the gold. In nature, the '~~.is of turbulent water move the micron god as if it '~re an ion thu~ r~sulting in a "elatively even widespread deposit. The breaking ice ~~yns result in the liberation of water tidal waves that flush th~ clays, generated by the hy&~tion of the granitic feldspa~'s, as well a£ the soluble salts, S~uth thr~u~h Mexice and into the Pacific oceai~ [n sumniary, the rnineral al~era.'ion procedu~e ~uccd by natUr~ can be ~upli~ted in the laboratory, and thu~ the. pr~~etl pO$tulati~n is "jable.
E
...>>>"" BTW Bob Barefoot sent to me and gave permission to post last year, it is one Maxam Gold Thread who used his process - see thread - Mongoose was the Machine thy invented.
Chuca-Go Maxam- MXAM and Go BMD-BHMNF, Centamental guy, and a wild and Crazy Model! Or is it? Ask ya self, do ya feel lucky ...Market Maker...well, do ya?



To: Ed Devlin who wrote (86)4/15/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 402
 
You know that guy who taught me about Gradiance and Lobing thru the highs and the lows who lives in my town....well...he was a former Chevron Oil guy in California....good things come out of California:
So this is Chevron Canada...seems like a stretch but Shell- Syncrude just might have some similar dat thing to share with BMD ? it connects-RE:
ReQuest Seismic Surveys Ltd -
ReQuest to acquire seismic data from Chevron
ReQuest Seismic Surveys Ltd RSH
Shares issued 10,650,700 1999-04-14 close $1.83
Thursday Apr 15 1999

Mr. Todd Chuckry reports:
ReQuest Seismic Surveys Ltd. and Chevron Canada Resources jointly announce that they have entered into a purchase and sale agreement providing for the acquisition by ReQuest of approximately 120,000 kilometres of Chevron's 100 per cent proprietary 2-D seismic data.
ReQuest's president and chief executive officer, Todd Chuckry, commented; "The petroleum industry is making a fundamental shift in how seismic data is perceived. Historically, seismic data has been treated as a closely held trade secret with little monetary value. Under the new paradigm seismic data is viewed as an asset which oil and gas producers no longer need to own. We are pleased to be on the leading edge of this transition."
ReQuest's purchase of the Chevron seismic data monetizes a hidden asset for Chevron. Jim Simpson, president of Chevron remarked, "Chevron is very pleased to be entering into this agreement. This database is one of the best and most extensive in the oil and gas industry including most of the significant exploration and producing regions in Western Canada." Mr. Simpson added, "The Chevron data has earned a long standing reputation for its high quality and ability to generate revenue and we are very confident that it will continue to serve as a valuable asset to ReQuest well into the future."
Upon completion of the acquisition, ReQuest will have one of the largest 100 per cent proprietary free trading seismic databases in Canada. This will allow ReQuest to be in a better position to meet the market demand for high quality regional seismic data. For over 30 years, Chevron has used its own seismic acquisition crews using consistent parameters to record seismic data. Chevron's attention to detail is apparent in the quality of its data.
ReQuest and Chevron have agreed to keep the purchase price confidential. FirstEnergy Capital Corp. has been retained by ReQuest to advise on the acquisition and assist on its financing.
ReQuest is in the business of providing access to seismic data information to customers within the oil and gas industry. ReQuest manages the flow of seismic information for sale purposes on behalf of other companies, acts as a broker to facilitate the licensing of seismic information between vendors and purchasers and creates, markets and supervises the acquisition of new seismic data inventory, thereby adding to the asset base of ReQuest.

(c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com

Chuca-going for the hot spots and the bulkie rolls- we call them "Subs" in Massachusetts. Bye- Submarine Sandwich Roll.