SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Z Analyzer who wrote (818)4/14/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: Robert Douglas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1989
 
Good quarter for Seagate. Without the charges, SEG would have earned 6.6% on revenues. To put this in perspective, in the 90s there has only been one full year with margins above this. That was 1997 when they earned just over 7%. So if competition is going to kill the margins at the high-end, it hasn't shown up yet. Still, this is where the risk lies.

So what's this puppy worth? I've always felt that a company that can earn 5% net margins was worth 20 times earnings or one times sales. Seagate's quarterly sales annualized would be 7.2 billion dollars or about $30 a share. Add to this (my estimates) that SEG's other holdings are worth $15 to $20, and I believe we still have some upside. If SEG can continue to earn this 6.6% net margin, then I think it is worth more. Some top-line growth would be nice also. <g>

-Robert



To: Z Analyzer who wrote (818)4/14/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: William Epstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1989
 
Z Analyzer;

I generally agree except when they are this size. The analysts don't give these charges too much weight. However, no charges would be better. Last quarter there were no charges and the stock responded at the beginning of January. Of course, some people say that earnings don't count when it comes to pricing the stock anyway. God forbid, I should be one of them.
PHOTOMAN