To: DR. MEADE who wrote (7302 ) 4/14/1999 6:06:00 PM From: J. Merlin Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13776
Great post from NPEC board!!!! What truth bared!!! ROTFLMAO Maggie: ie. Dr. MEADE J. could never ruin the thread. To ruin something means that it was once in good condition. To ruin is "the action of destroying, laying waste, or wrecking" (Websters). But you did that long ago. There was nothing to ruin. Sorry about giving yet another definition. I just worry sometimes that you're far too imprecise in what you say. For example, you say, "News next week!!!!" But what you really mean to say is, "I sure hope there's news next week, but I have no basis for believing it." Or, you say, "J., Grantsi, et al. are evil agents of Satan designed to ruin this thread!!! Do not trust them. All they do is bash!!" When what you really mean to say is, "I don't like it when people talk bad about a company I'm hyping. You should trust me, instead, who has been absolutely wrong in every one of my predictions. All I do is hype." Let's be clear about what we mean for now on. You're a hypester for NPEC (I don't mean to imply that you're actually getting paid to degrade yourself by consistently giving bad advice -- I just mean you hype the stock unmercifully). You have no objective basis for saying anything with regard to this thread. You ruined it long ago with your inane mantra: "BUY! BUY! BUY!" The odd thing about this is, you come across as being so silly, so immature, that I am POSITIVE you can't be serious about most of what you say. It would be hard for me to believe that you're as bad as you portray yourself on this thread. That's a backhanded compliment. It means, you're not as silly as you seem on the thread. Which leads me to wonder what your game is...?