Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (417)	4/14/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10354

Its the truth that made SFLK go down the tubes not me. You have it all wrong to think I can drive a stock from $5 1/4 to 2 bucks. Your analogy is like being at the track being up a grand then losing it all and then saying your even.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (417)	4/14/1999 6:18:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 10354

OIA President, Mr D Scott Elder (ZSUN SUB): "UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15320 / April 8, 1997 SEC v. Jerome E. Pinckney, Richard L. Arnold, Donald E. Elder, Fernando Cruz, Shaun K.R. Maxwell, Anthony Bukovich, Jr., and Six Capital Corporation (E.D.N.C., Civil Action No. 7:95-CV-122-BR-1) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on March 27, 1997, the Honorable W. Earl Britt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, entered an order of permanent injunction against defendant, Donald E. Elder ("Elder"), from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Court found that the imposition of civil penalties would be considered at a later date upon motion by the Commission. Elder consented to the relief without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in a complaint filed by the Commission on August 23, 1995. The complaint alleged that Elder violated the antifraud statute by offering for sale investment contracts which were part of a prime bank scheme. Elder attempted to obtain funds from investors by misrepresenting or failing to disclose material facts in connection with the sale of prime bank notes. Among other misrepresentations, Elder falsely represented that the investments were risk-free and that contractual guarantees of payment were being given by a major United Statesbank." Why is it that these scumbags always promise not to do something again that they never should have done in the first place?