Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Byron who wrote (5285)	4/14/1999 6:36:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81130

quote.yahoo.com^RUT&d=3ms Wouldn't the comparison of the Russell 2K with the S&P 500 {where pundits say the S&P is driven by only a few larger caps} suggest that as you say, the Russell is/was in a bear market for a long while. And would that not also suggest that the DOW, and S&P index's are open to increasing volatility, and at risk for greater downtrends? But since the Russell 1000 and S&P 500 are nearly uniform, would that suggest a convergence of discrete sectors only, lead by the ones chosen for the index's?. quote.yahoo.com^RUI&d=3ms But then if the Russell 1000 is linear to the S&P 500, and the Russell 2000 is not, how do we explain the Russell 3000, and it's linear trends to the S&P 500? quote.yahoo.com^RUA&d=3ms What is wrong with the Russell 2000? {someone said to much interent included?} Could be worse, sorry: quote.yahoo.com^XAU&d=5ys