SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Char who wrote (7956)4/14/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Respond to of 11603
 
Thanks, mine were durring the Market Hours.
Have a good day, and thanks for the Level 2 education 202.
Chuca
PS- yes, just called Dale to say hi and ..go Maxam Gold...and the Map M is my Favorite. Obviously, no decoder ring questions from me, I think in code. I don't understand it but I gutcode do things...
it made sense to me...I'll send you the real last page for the heck of it..
Chuca
HERE: The Finalee: Bob Barefoots' great basin Gold Discovery THeory!
- - . - -

~'ith s~ch appar~ntiy ovc~hc1ming disproving factors hQw can ariyOn~ ~C)flt1 nuc t~ j~stify the exi~tence of such massive gold deposits ? Well, as the gener~l public ha~ become acc~istomed to learning, '~~~pert5~f are &om~imes Wrong ~s many times as thev
~ right. ~x~tis of the day once swore that the world ~ flat, tl'tat man would never fly, and that you WOLLId have to be a ILirLatic to believe that man would ever walk on the moon. Albert EinsteinEs theory on relativity w&s ~ challengcd by th~ expe~s of the day that '~l'ey gof together and published a rebukin£ article entitled, ·'Or~ Hundred Again~t Ein~tein" . Einstcin retorted that if they were right. one would be cnou8h'~.

As technology evolves, new answers to old problems are constantly being found The retult is a' drarnatic shifi in the opinion of the ex~rt, Well, even though th~re ha~ not been any major change in gold technology for more th~n 100 yeaTs, technology has evolved recently in the pi~cess of gold e~tntction from ores. A trrceess of electrically char metal in a f&st moving ~ater sluit'y and then capturing the meta] as it pass~s OV~[ ~A o~~OBLtcly c~ged collector; has been developed. Absolut~ly no chc~icels are ~sed in the procc~s, which cam produce conccntn~ues up to thousands of ouncc~s per ton. The ~tented proccsS is lcno~n as the [}'fferciitial Charge Recovery ~stcm (Il)CRS ).
Hematite ores that are run ~om the Gr~at Basin using the DCRS process yield recoveries that are dramatically hj~er th~ the atnount indicated by the certified ftre as~y of the head ore. Also, the tailings p~duced by r~moving the gold using the f)CRS ptoc~s ~rc
assay sub~tantia1ly higher than the, hcad ore. This, of course appetrs to be impossible. However, when cxarnjrw,~ all of the facto~, the conclusion has to be the unthinkable, that the fir~ assays 2r~~ ineorr~ct. Once it is recognized th~t the fire assays Suffer fTom the acid slag effect, procedures car' be d~veloped to remove thc cause, acid salts, so tha-~ the ass~ys can tnore ~ur'a~ly reflect tha gold content of the hematite ore. ~~is is exactly what happens.. Certifietl fitt as~ys of the washed ~amp3es a~say rn~y nia~mitucles hi~her than certified a~says of the wi'~shed ore. Hence, the partially water ~'ashed tailings produced by the DCRS ~ocess should ind~d as~ay higher than the unwashed head Qre.

Thus, with the wa~becl OTe as~~ays now v~~fyjn~ both the exi~tenee of gold and th..? r~~~,,,~mitude of the de~~its, ~ viable geologi~l cxplar'ation f~r such a massive de~sit that contains t~ou~nds of times tbe woriti'5 ~ol~ reserves mu~ be postulated. Conventional geologists have no explanati'oris that could explain such a deposit Thus, no experts on this type of gold deposii exist,

The professional geologists, chemists and metallur~ists we"c wrong to concude th~~ the gold did not exist n the£e depotrts, and the clcndestin~ ehernis'~s were
profes~i0nai ~logists. who have no an5wers, scolf a' tP~e chemist wt}~ i.~ attempting t. providc a vieble expla~ation by explaining that he be1~eves that t~e deposits are the d~re~t result of glacial activi~. ~e bemused ~cologirt, respond~d t~f. che~,?st5 should .'rtick t Chern?stjy. AJ~OthCr explained th~t A~~on~ bat aI~v~ys heen tofi warm for "'laciers. 14.o~v ~ geology books explain how platt tectonics res~,Ji in the continents mo~ing apart and drifling Over ~ ~ resulting in m'~p' st~~~'ng tbe .\ort~ Po~u existing a~ a
We now ~a1l Tuescn, Ahrona T0 the layman, ~'h~s rn~&ns that ~ wa~ once urde-.
At 03:00 PM 4/14/99, you wrote:
>Chuca, what language was the bottom quarter of this written in??
>
>At 02:17 PM 4/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:12:28 -0400
>>To: "j@aol.com" <j257@aol.com>
>>From: Chuca Marsh <bondee@ici.net>
>>Subject: hang tuff 22 april PGM meet Birch Mountain
>>
>>THE GREAT BASIN GOLD DISCOVERY
>>By Bob Barefoot, July 6, 1994
>>
>>
>>A new and 'abundant of goid has been discovered. The gold occurs as
>sulfate salt-encapsultated micron gold. ln naturc ti ts found in hematite
>(hydrated iron oxide) sand, but it can also be found in the sulfide
>tailings of copper and gold ores. It has remained hidden from man's fire
>assay gold gold analysis as the acid salt reacts with the sodium
>carbonate the fire assay flux to generate large volumes of carbon dioxide
>gas whiich propel the encapsulated gold as a froth to the top of the assay
>cup which it cannot be entrapped by the ccouring lead in the flux. It lead
>in theilux ( known as "acid slag effect" in assay and mining journalss ).
>The encapsulation blocks the gold frpm vision, as well as...causing
>numerous analytical difficulties. However, once salt has been removed (
>Patent Pending) the gold is assayable by Certified Fire Assay!
>>Note- Rest of scan is messed upo
>>
>>~or decades bttndnedt of ~ate~ ~ labo~tones" all over the daoial dtaina~ ~
>~~yen'ng ~ of the lo~ ~tates of ~tah~~1jIOrni~ ~cvu~di and Anzont
>>'The G1eal Btain ) have been ~ 5~h hematite ore ~LSt~
>>~ ~~oc~e$ and ~ of gold that We~ ~ beyond the tetlm of crtd'bility. The
>profCSsio~~~ on tics eou~d not ~ the wo~ ~tng the tied and ~~ven ee~fied
>fl~ ~y, and tlt~ dismiSSed all auch clairns as l(aud'11~~~ The aLzLhOt.
>apolo~~UY ·d£ni.ts to being part of the igr~~~I't clorus. Act~lly, the
>~OCCd~5 ~sed by ~ of the ~ laos wt!C ~~~ives of the totaby acctpt~ble ~ of
>~ ~ and c~pel foY two ~ ~ umas the as~Y ~~blern$ ca~~ by acid
>slag ate well 6oco~~ed tn both assay and ~ining jou~L The r~ that thi
>p[Uf~i~ ~mtnUfltty ~ ~~bie to the high ~ was ihat neithe~ ~y~or
>thei~ atnate~ ~ ~ the probLem and. theT~fort, did not 1~5~an~ ~ the ~
>~ with dthydrat~ Wt~ioh inC~CS~~~t ~ipj~tion and ~ ~ the pr~blctn ef time
>i.. ~~ng ~ onett has leren ~~ognized~ and the teml ~ scnsit'Ve ore' has
>been coined.
>>
>>~ofetsio~l ~ologisls reiect the cl~detti,,,ne)ab. Ii, ~ding$ for, the
>followhug rtasons:
>>
>>
>>~3fcStiOfl~~l ~ ~ect the clandesune lab ftndin~ for the Iollowin~ r~asQns'
>>
>>
>>
>>l Th~ are Lin~ble to ~ the ~ with third pa'~Y ~ fire Ls$gy5.
>>2. ~ey arc ~~~ble to duplicate the results with the sattle ~ n thi~ partY
>labs..
>>3, They arc u~blCto ~~ethC ~~ld with ftflelec~n ~iOrOscoP~.
>>4 ~ ~de of the gold in ea~h deposit ti al~vays t~hi~to be explained hy
>an'Y knoWn ~1O~L~l CItou1~~'
>>5 The thickneSs and artal e'ctettt of each depostt is so v~t that the
>rtSCf~et ~mplitd by ~cn ~posit wOuLd ~ th, cur~~~r16 gold rcScTVeS elteady
>ntj~d.
>>6. Oth~r pr0~iO~~S~ ~a3yst5 and ~~ta~lurgiStS ~~tc with their conclusions.
>>7, No one has evet ~ ~ined such deposita.
>>ice. and that once again thc '9experts" are wrong. ~owever. this ice age
>i~ not the one that is belic"od to have created the massiv$ hematite ~old
>deposits. The geological Pleistocene era which created the Great Basin
>arbd which ended 30,000 y~ars ago, is believed t( be responsible for the
>nuinerous and 'nassive gold deposits
>>
>>The tirst question thAt ~ust be ari5~~d is whe~ did all of the gold come
>from '? The ~lvgist only has explanations for deposits o~ly a tiny fraction
>of the sizt of the hematite depo5i~ Th~s uripublished explanations must be
>postulated. To begin ~vith,
>>~ know thaI gold conieS from the molten bowels of the ~vth Most of the
>massive ~ld deposits known today exist thousands of feet below the surface
>in Pre~ambr'an Rock (over 500,000,000 years old). The real question to be
>answ~red is how did such a massive amount of s~h gold"eriii'chcd
>l're-Ga~briin rock end up on the ~urface as he~atite sand? Wbcn we look
>today at the most rn~ive surface deposit of gold that is lcnown to exist
>today, we are looking at the Carlin trend which was produced by a massive
>fault, which h~~6 the lower Pre~ambrian Ore ~ the surf~ce, and then flipped
>over (ow' its belly) exposi~ all of the ore at the surface. Any laytnan
>would expect that what has proven to h~ppea once geologically, must have
>happ~ned rrLany tin~es ~f6re. Then whe~ arc the oth~ Carlins?
>>
>>Lets suppose, just for the sake of argtunent. that hundreds of Carl~ns
>e~isted in the northeni United States and Car'~ in pr~~glacial tiinCs. When
>the glaciers came, they would have ~ound up th~sc carb~type ~posits. The
>amo~ of ice wa£ so rt~assive that it lowered the surface of the oCeVis
>aboL[t 650 feet. Thus when this utassive amount of ice melted, it [eleased
>oceans of water, which w~ trapped by the mountain ranges in the westein
>United States This forc~ the tlLrbuient flow (~ water mnd gold bearing Pa~
>Cambria~i rock debris to pass into the Great ~asin creatin~ huge lakes. The
>flowing water flushed the lighter mjn~~lg so~h into Mexico and the Pacific
>ocea~.
>>
>>The next question to be answered is how did a granitic Pre-Cambric Rock
>end up as a hematite sand? The answer lies in the science of mineral
>diagenesis which is a FANCY name for the "Study of how minerals are altered
>when exposed to the changing environrnents of nature." If a gold-rich
>granitic rock is ground up in the laboratory and flushed with a large
>volume of water for several years, the result would be a hematite residue
>containing gold.
>>Chuca would call this akin to Paleo Channel Tech of the XRAL SGS Lavalin
>Group aka :
>>http://www.mmigeochem.com
>>WHAT I CALL MMI- sand channels.....Sediments explained 101-202
>>EOM no more editing...advise if Bobs Phone Number in Arizona is
>wanted...by PM or chucalo@aol.com
>>... the defect scanning continues...This is the DCRS - differential
>Charged Theory that was the start for many of us to UNDERSTAND the Models
>of the needed study...even the STUDY of a Brine in the Prairie golde Model
>- of Birch Mountain - I can not wait for the recap at that Wednesday
>MEETING...a week from taoday!
>>The octehedral micno~~ gold would have been liberated ~m the ~ulfides ~s
>th~y oxidized, under water, into sulfate~. and the res~ltirt~ sulfuric acid
>would have reac'.~d ~jih the caibonates to liberate the calcium The
>re~u!t would be a positively .~urface charged octahednI gold crystal being
>~urround~d by the ~egatively charged '~alf~te ion v/hich subse~uently
>attracts the positively c~~r~cd calcium ion, resulting In the
>c'i.capsulation by prec2p*:tation of calcium ~ulfat~ ar~und the gold. In
>nature, the '~~.is of turbulent water move the micron god as if it '~re an
>ion thu~ r~sulting in a "elatively even widespread deposit. The breaking
>ice ~~yns result in the liberation of water tidal waves that flush th~
>clays, generated by the hy&~tion of the granitic feldspa~'s, as well a£ the
>soluble salts, S~uth thr~u~h Mexice and into the Pacific oceai~ [n
>sumniary, the rnineral al~era.'ion procedu~e ~uccd by natUr~ can be
>~upli~ted in the laboratory, and thu~ the. pr~~etl pO$tulati~n is "jable.
>>E<<<<
>>
>>
>
>