SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (9084)4/14/1999 10:19:00 PM
From: Senthil Sankarappan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
RR, aren't you getting really desperate here?. First, you ask everyone to sell IOM since it is going for 2's and then you buy that exact one at 5 1/8 just to sell at the same price. Now you are saying AAPL earned 84c while it really did 60c with out any one time gain. AAPL has beaten the expectations by roughly 5% while IOM has beaten the expectations in the last 2 Qtrs by a wider margin.

Well. i know that u exist only because of IOM's stinking stock price.
There is no one in the world that can stop you from posting here. Hopefully, things will turn around for IOM and you will vanish ;-)

-senthil



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (9084)4/15/1999 8:30:00 AM
From: David Harker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10072
 
>But seriously, see, this is the difference between a REAL company
>and a farce like Iomega

Huh? Until a few years ago Apple was the farce. Now they have
new management, focussed on cost reduction and internal efficiency
(ie, more inventory turns) and saw future results improve (NOW).

Sound like what a certain other company is doing?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News