SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Burt Roger who wrote (2723)4/15/1999 1:43:00 AM
From: Walter Morton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18366
 
I bought my first CD over the Internet a week ago after listening to an entire CD via Broadcast.com. I guess I felt guilty for going back to that CD again and again for free. It took about three days to get the CD and it cost about $3 to ship it to me. In this case shipping represented nearly 20% of the cost. I was a bit disappointed when I put the CD into my computer and played it through my Monsoon speakers. The CD did not sound any better than it did when I was having it piped in through the Internet. The only advantages are that I don't have those annoying interruptions that you get when there is a lot of traffic on the Internet and I can turn the volume up about three times louder. I sure am glad I liked all of the songs on the CD.

I think downloading music from the Internet is going to be much faster than waiting for the CD to arrive through the mail.

However, I am sure that most people will not be able to notice any difference between the sound over the Internet and the sound of MP3 or a2bmusic.com, or PAC.

So, it may come down the the player that stores the most in the least amount of space.

Maybe it will come down to the Web site that can download music the fastest.



To: Burt Roger who wrote (2723)4/15/1999 4:38:00 AM
From: Savant  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18366
 
Burt, just as a matter of curiosity, is there any reason EDIG can't command the same price per share as the internut stocks..with equivalent shares outstanding?...ie in the $xxx.xx range?..EDIG would certainly seem to have a better chance to have greater net revenues in a much shorter time frame, with incredible potential long term.
Pondering,
Savant