Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Young who wrote (117745)	4/15/1999 9:15:00 AM
From: BGR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Rich, A very good article by the Fools! Thanks very much for posting. -BGR.

To: Rich Young who wrote (117745)	4/15/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: Claude	Respond to of 176387

Thanks for the article - LOL! I love that Motley Fool article about Niles (the unnamed) but isn't their argument flawed? Why do they say you need to get back in at 43? I understand they're using the taxes paid to arrive at the number but aren't they forgetting that you will eventually PAY those taxes (perhaps at a slightly lower long term rate). If they already have shares they have held a year it would seem as long as they can buy back at a price that covers commisions they are even. For short term shares they would need to cover the 8% differential between short term and long term rates plus commissions. What am I missing? Claude (rhymes with TOAD)

To: Rich Young who wrote (117745)	4/15/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Mohan Marette	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

Well you know what that means- you sell it now so we can pick it up on the cheap-Isn't that how it works? That Dan guy is an idiot I am afraid,the public more so if they take his advice and sell Intel on his less than genuine 'advice'. Thanks for that url great read for sure.