Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PairGain Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob who wrote (30406)	4/15/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: Greg Thornton	Respond to of 36349

Bob, I am a subscriber to that theory as well. The fact that an employee might be responsible makes it even more likely. Greg

To: Bob who wrote (30406)	4/15/1999 1:17:00 PM
From: jas cooper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36349

My theory is that this was not a bogus story, it was too professionally written. I think it was a draft or work in progress that we were not supposed to see yet. How about Dewey/Truman? Still up in the air on that one?

To: Bob who wrote (30406)	4/15/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: Robert Webb	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36349

Long time lurker who finally broke down and paid the SI reg. fee. Who would have guessed that a bogus Pair story would be the catalyst! Jay, I have been long Pair for a few years, and I feel your pain. My average is $20! Luckily it not one of my primary holdings. Anyway, I also subscribe to Bob's theory, but the question now is will the deal go through given the info is public albeit not substantiated? I think the SEC might have something to say about it. This is a good thread. Bob/