SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CGI Group (GIB.A) - -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg R who wrote (1165)4/16/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: claud_c  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1673
 
Sounds like a win/win situation. Still doing some business elsewhere, but if this baby breaks inertia, may come back very soon. I will follow this one closely…

Thanks Greg, your input is much appreciated.
Best of luck!

Claude



To: Greg R who wrote (1165)4/20/1999 8:51:00 AM
From: claud_c  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1673
 
Greg- It's still too soon to draw conclusions, but if the first few minutes of play are to show the “allure” of this hockey match, I'd say: “You're on to something!” 1st period… 2 minutes in the game… ref calls a .5% DJ penalty for high valuation. Hmmm… My bookie says: “ Put a deuce on Greg.”

Following the play by play…

Have a good day!

Claude



To: Greg R who wrote (1165)4/28/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Greg R  Respond to of 1673
 
Claude - On April 15 I said <<Instead of $35.50 on April 30, it could be $24 next Thursday (worse case)>> I have no idea where I got that date (Thursday) from. I have been corrected. It should have read April 30 (Friday) or May 3 Monday.

Unfortunately, the stock has not yet committed itself to the expected path or the worse case. I have a stop loss on my holdings however just in case. I would rather sell out now and buy back next week at a lower price if it doesn't get with it and damn fast.

Greg



To: Greg R who wrote (1165)4/30/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: Greg R  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1673
 
Claude - Well, we got the $35.50 on April 30. So, it appears the normally expected pattern is right. That takes us to a minimum price of $70 mid June. The price should be higher prior to that. Of course I said the price should be higher prior to April 30's $35.50 as well and I was wrong. Oh well, I guess I will just have to settle for a measly $70 mid June.

I want to see a couple of more days of action before being absolutely positive, but it looks very good.

Greg