SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D. Long who wrote (3940)4/15/1999 8:48:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 17770
 
Lot of money are to be made by ethnic hungarians... :)

For Hungary, new NATO
membership is mixed
blessing
11:09 a.m. Apr 15, 1999 Eastern

By Michael Roddy

MOHACS, Hungary, April 15
(Reuters) - In this small Hungarian
port on the Danube River,
residents have a daily reminder of
NATO's air war against
neighbouring Yugoslavia.

''The bombs are falling just 130
km (80 miles) away,'' said Attila
Hejjas, finance director of the
MOFA fibreboard factory,
Mohacs's biggest employer, with
some 480 workers. ''Very often at
night we can hear the airplanes
overhead,'' he told Reuters during
a visit this week to Mohacs, last
stop on the Danube before it flows
into Croatia and, further on,
Serbia.

Hungary, along with Poland and
the Czech Republic, joined NATO
on March 12, just 12 days before
NATO began its bombing
campaign to end Serb repression
of ethnic Albanians in the southern
Serbian province of Kosovo.

Some officials in the new NATO
countries see the bombing as
confirmation they made the right
choice, providing security on their
road to eventual membership of
the European Union.

''Poland can feel safe,'' Polish
Defence Minister Janusz
Onyszkiewicz said. ''If NATO
intervened there (Kosovo) it will
have a hundred times more
reasons to intervene if Poland's
security is threatened.''

But among Hungarians there is a
growing fear that Hungary, with its
flat terrain and long border with
Serbia, could play a key role if
NATO decides to send in ground
troops.

NATO says it has no plans to fight
the Yugoslav army on the ground
and the suggestion is almost angrily
dismissed by some top Hungarian
officials.

''People are getting worried partly
because of the reports of some
experts giving ideas of what kinds
of actions should be taken -- but
this is an academic exercise,''
Foreign Minister Janos Martonyi
told Reuters.

But reports of planning for ground
troop deployment have appeared
in U.S. newspapers and Istvan
Szent-Ivanyi, head of the
Hungarian parliamentary
committee on foreign affairs, said
on Thursday he was aware that
Hungary figured in them.

''We understand that there are
plans,'' he told a press breakfast in
Budapest. ''But I'm sure that...only
in the ultimate case is it
conceivable at all.''

Hungarians generally support the
bombing campaign but are
distinctly worried about a ground
war.

A recent Gallup poll showed that
61 percent of 500 people polled
supported the NATO bombing,
virtually unchanged from a poll
taken just after the bombing
started.

But it also showed that only 35
percent of Hungarians would
support a ground war against the
Yugoslavs -- compared to polls in
the United States showing a
majority of Americans now in
favour of a ground war if it is
deemed necessary.

Hungarians also are concerned
about how any ground war might
affect the 300,000 ethnic
Hungarians living across the border
in the northern Serbian province of
Vojvodina.

Istvan Erdelyi, head of the Interior
Ministry's office of refugees and
immigration, said just under 300
Yugoslav ethnic Hungarians, most
of them men, had entered Hungary
and applied for refugee status since
the bombing began.

So far there is no sign of a mass
exodus, but he said he was
worried it could change.

''At the moment there is no sign of
discrimination against the
Hungarians in Vojvodina,'' he said.

''But I have this fear that if the
Serbs in Vojvodina start to attack
their Hungarian neighbours
because Hungary is a member of
NATO, we could get refugees in
much larger numbers.''

Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited.



To: D. Long who wrote (3940)4/15/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: Stormweaver  Respond to of 17770
 
Maybe not but Russia is rich with oil ... they just have to find a way to transport it there now.