Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (34970)	4/16/1999 1:14:00 AM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Chuzz, my turn to take strong exception. Let us say that Ockham's Razor works best in situations where you are looking for a single cause, or a single explanation. It works less well in situations where you anticipate many causes, and multiple explanations. Or: it works best in situations where you need/must employ strict scientific method. It works less well -- or not at all -- in situations that demand a different sort of understanding or approach. Would you employ Ockham's Razor in literary criticism, for example? 1) You would if you were trying to determine authorship of a particular document. 2) You would not if you were trying to demonstrate the (presumably many) literary merits of the document. Joan