Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE COFFEE SHOP--A place to discuss Minute Subjects -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (21585)	4/16/1999 12:51:00 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24894

From what I've read the Clintons have huge legal bills. Some people questioned whether Hillary would run for Senator in New York because she would make less money as a Senator than she would in private practice. The drift of the article was that they needed money to pay the bills and Hillary was more marketable than Bill. Also, she has always been the bread winner. Author of article thought it was time for Bill to go to work but author didn't think Bill could make as much money as his wife. Wealthy friends may have helped them out but their legal bills were very, very substantial unless something has changed. They were never wealthy people. They never even owned a house as far as I know.