SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PairGain Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Linda Kaplan who wrote (30505)4/16/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: jas cooper  Respond to of 36349
 
Give us a precis, at least?

A tale of great minds on SI at work!



To: Linda Kaplan who wrote (30505)4/16/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: George A. Roberts  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36349
 
I hate doing this but I will post this as I am part of the story (g). I encourage you all to get trial subscriptions to TheStreet.com . Here is the text of the Paigain story and a link to TSC.

register.thestreet.com

Chat 'n Chewed Up: A PairGain Parable
By Gregg Wirth and Kevin Petrie
Staff Reporters
4/15/99 6:41 PM ET

When money manager Charlie Smith saw the spike in PairGain Technologies'
(PAIR:Nasdaq) stock, he didn't go to Bloomberg or Dow Jones in search of
information. He went to Silicon Investor.

"I have PairGain's thread on Silicon Investor bookmarked," says Smith, who runs
money for Pittsburgh-based Fort Pitt Capital.

It was early in the trading day on April 7.

At the other end of Pennsylvania, on the outskirts of Philadelphia, James Cooper
turned on his PC shortly before trading began and visited the same SI thread for a
routine check of the daily chatter. Cooper likes to comb messages for what he calls
"contrarian indicators." Often, when messages grow too enthusiastic he sells.

Reading and Believing
PairGain shares' movement on April 7

Source: BigCharts

Just after trading began, Cooper spotted a link to what purported to be a Bloomberg
story. He clicked through and found the piece.

Minutes later and more than a thousand miles away in Lawrence, Kan., George
Roberts, a local landlord and sporadic online trader, was weighing a decision over his
breakfast, a cup of coffee. He had seen the PairGain news during a routine morning
run through the SI boards. Now, Roberts was trying to decide whether to add to his
500-share position. At first glance, he had no reason to doubt the buyout news.

Then he noticed the stock wasn't rising as quickly as one would expect on a takeover
bid. He reassured himself, he says, by looking at the stock's heavy volume. "I figured
with this volume, this couldn't have been just message board nonsense," he says.

Indeed, it was more than message board nonsense. It was a fake. The report that
PairGain was being acquired by Israel's ECI Telecom (ECILF:Nasdaq ADR) was
fake. The purported Bloomberg story was fake. The site it linked to that looked like
Bloomberg's site was fake.

On Thursday, the FBI arrested Gary Hoke, a 25-year-old PairGain employee in North
Carolina. According to the Justice Department, Hoke was charged with one count of
securities fraud for allegedly "disseminating false information."

The motives of Hoke, who faces up to 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine, are
unclear. In an affidavit filed in the case, the FBI doesn't allege that Hoke traded
PairGain stock on April 7, although he has traded online and even traded PairGain as
recently as January, the Justice Department says. A PairGain official confirmed that
Hoke was an employee. Hoke couldn't be reached for comment.

This ruse is so much more than another tired parable about the dubious world of
online investing and the stock-touting message board denizens. It is, perhaps, the
clearest sign yet that the populism of the Internet has turned investing into a game in
which often-questionable information sends stocks on roller-coaster rides and involves
everyone from online traders sitting at home to savvy professionals. Many of these
people trade stocks, not companies, often based on innuendo, not analysis.

One Canadian investor who would disclose only his Net handle, "Peppe," bought and
sold 4,000 shares into the fake reports. He turned a $3,000 profit on a 20-minute
investment. And he wouldn't hesitate to do it again: "If I knew [stock news] was wrong
and the stock was still going up, I'd trade it."

Perhaps most important for the person behind the PairGain hoax, this cauldron
offered a sort of nuclear-powered incubator for false information.

Outside Philadelphia on the morning of the hoax, Cooper read the fake Bloomberg
story and immediately grew leery. Why were there no ticker symbols in the story? He
went to the actual Bloomberg site and noticed that the PairGain story was missing
from the top stories list.

Still, Cooper decided to climb aboard as the stock rose. "I guess I was just getting on
for the ride," he says. "At that point you're not thinking hoax, you're thinking 19 bucks
a share," the price he figured using the overall purported buyout price.

At 10:01 a.m. EDT, using his online-trading account with Charles Schwab, Cooper
snapped up 1,000 shares from 9 7/16 to 9 1/2.

While reluctant to use the term "retired," Cooper two years ago closed his career as a
computer-network administrator. The 46-year-old investor characterizes his personal
trading as a preoccupation more than an occupation. Last year, Cooper's portfolio
grew about 40%, and he's up about 10% this year. He had owned PairGain since
September.

Back on Silicon Investor, Pitt Capital's Smith was starting to see what all the fuss
was about. Smith saw the PairGain thread was alive with new messages about a
takeout bid for PairGain for $1.35 billion in cash.

As Smith read on, he found an SI message that seemed to summarize what all the
fuss was about. The SI message linked to another message posted on the Yahoo!
(YHOO:Nasdaq) message boards at the start of trading by a poster called
"staceyITN." The Yahoo message linked to the fake Bloomberg page.

"The site really looked good," Smith says. But Smith's suspicions were aroused by
the lack of any share price for the stock. When Smith calculated the per-share price,
he saw PairGain was up only to 11 and change on "news" of what he figured would be
roughly an $18-per-share buyout. "It was so far below the price, I knew it couldn't have
been real," he says. "An $18 bid would take an $8 stock to $16 or $17, not $10 or
$11," he notes. (PairGain hit a high of 11 7/8 on April 7, a 31% increase over its close
the day before the hoax.)

It was enough to send Smith to his Rolodex. "I decided to go right to the horse," he
says. After leaving two messages, he finally reached PairGain's investor relations
department.

In Kansas, Roberts was still deciding what to do. "I was going to log into
Waterhouse Securities [where he has his brokerage account], and I even went to
the home page, but then I didn't go through with it," he says. "Greed makes you do
things without thinking." After giving the matter some more thought, Roberts decided
he was content with the 500 shares he already owned.

Meanwhile, outside Philly, Cooper kept checking on his new investment. On the fake
Bloomberg page, he began taking out letters from the page's Web address,
essentially backing up. That put him at Angelfire, an online community managed by
Lycos (LCOS:Nasdaq) that allows members to create their own Web sites.

"I realized [the PairGain story] was a phony page," he says.

About the same time in Pittsburgh, Smith, who had yet to buy any PairGain shares,
had the company's IR department on the line. The company representative said the
news was false. Within minutes, Smith had posted the company's denial on SI.

Cooper grew more worried and decided he wanted no part of such a dicey trade.
Shortly after 10 a.m., he exited the stock he had bought about 10 minutes earlier at
roughly the same price. Net of commissions, Cooper figures he lost $40.

Roberts in Kansas says he was lucky. "It was an interesting day," he says. "I am
really amazed there is so much power in the Internet. These sites [like SI and Yahoo!]
can really move stocks, and not just the penny stocks, but everything."