SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : E*TRADE IPO ALERT THREAD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RickT who wrote (286)4/16/1999 12:07:00 PM
From: mfgrep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15145
 
Not only that....how would Matthew Rosenberg have a change in hell of getting in on ANY IPO's without E*Trade???

Rediculous!

Could create a nice buying opportunity in E*Trade stock!

Jason



To: RickT who wrote (286)4/16/1999 7:22:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15145
 
And if he whines enough, they'll cut us all off!

Well, those temps at Microsoft who sued over benefits have screwed every contract worker in America. I haven't talked to a single temp who supports them.

Here's a quote from a TheStreet.Com article about reading IPO Red Herrings:

How to Read an IPO Prospectus, Part 1
By Andy Kessler
Special to TheStreet.com
4/6/99 1:51 PM ET

...

First of all, I can guarantee you are not getting a lot of stock on these deals. Everyone is going to complain about his or her allocation on these IPOs; Fidelity usually gets the largest allocation, which consists of at most a measly 50,000 shares, relative to its hundreds of billions of dollars in assets.


And this wuss complains that he can only get 100 shares. Is his portfolio more than 1/500 that of Fidelity?