SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (118130)4/16/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: Ian Davidson  Respond to of 176387
 
Apologies if this has been previously posted:





IBM PCs back from "dead"
By Brooke Crothers
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
April 16, 1999, 4:00 a.m. PT

An IBM executive said yesterday that the PC is far from dead, echoing revisionist comments
being made by other executives and dampening speculation that IBM is going to get out of the PC
business.

Recent comments from IBM chief executive Lou Gerstner about the end of the PC era and calls by
analysts at prominent investment houses for IBM to exit the PC business have caught more than a
few people's attention.

But IBM's new general manager at the Personal Systems Group, Jim Pertzborn, said yesterday in an
interview that "the PC is far from dead."

"We're still seeing [PC] growth. It is fundamental for us to be in the PC business," said Pertzborn,
who became general manager two weeks ago. "We're unequivocally in the PC business."




But echoing Gerstner's sentiment he said that the "world has moved on from a client-server
[PC-centric] model to the network as the primary model of computing. This is what we're trying to
say."

Gerstner also qualified his PC-era-is-over declaration in a statement he made in the IBM annual
report. "This is not to say that PCs are going to die off, any more than mainframes vanished when
the IBM PC debuted in 1981...But the PC's reign as the driver of customer buying decisions and the
primary platform for application development is over. In all those respects, it has been supplanted
by the network," Gerstner said in the annual report.

The upshot is that IBM sees the PC as one of many possible
devices attached to a network in the future.

The "PC is dead" notion has its roots in the waning fortunes of PC
makers as boxes get cheaper and cheaper and profit margins
shrink. "PCs [at IBM] lost almost $1 billion last year and were
unprofitable in 1996 and 1997. The loss in PCs was a key reason
hardware only contributed 29 percent of corporate pretax profit,"
stated Merrill Lynch analyst Steven Milunovich said in a report.

"What's management going to do about it? We recommend that
IBM exit the desktop and consumer PC businesses and OEM PCs
from Dell or Intel and stick the IBM brand on it when required as
part of a solution," he added.

While this sort of turnaround doesn't appear to be in the works for Big Blue, the company has
recently struck a number of high-profile deals that do lend some credence to the theory that IBM is
looking for ways to change its position in the industry. Recently, IBM has signed multibillion
dollar deals with Dell and others under which IBM serves as a disk drive, chip, and display supplier
for companies marketing brand-name computers.

Startling statements, which were later revised, have also been coming from Hewlett-Packard. On
Tuesday, HP's chief executive Lew Platt said: "The PC era is over? I don't think so."

But Platt was seemingly less gung-ho about the PC in December, when he called them "pretty
crude."



To: TigerPaw who wrote (118130)4/16/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Friday April 16, 11:09 am Eastern Time
Fidelity Magellen Drops Intel , Lucent From Top 10 Holdings

biz.yahoo.com



To: TigerPaw who wrote (118130)4/16/1999 1:19:00 PM
From: W.B. Michaels  Respond to of 176387
 
RE:Fidelity-now you can easily see why their mutual fund performance records over past 5 years are pretty pathetic.wbm Selling good tech-growers because of Y2K-I have heard it all now.wbm



To: TigerPaw who wrote (118130)4/16/1999 1:20:00 PM
From: W.B. Michaels  Respond to of 176387
 
RE:Fidelity-now you see why their management record over past 5 years is pretty pathetic.wbm