SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gregg Powers who wrote (27288)4/16/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: Morgan Drake  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Apparently stock splits do matter. See the Winter Ed. of the Journal of Portfolio Management. A lot of prior academic literature backs up the author's instant article. In essence, stock splits are deemed to be a signaling device employed by management, directed toward their constituencies and analysts, that good times are foreseen.

Additionally, this brings more analysts into the fold. More analysts forecast earnings better. Etc.,etc.

I think the study periods go back more than 18 years. If I remember correctly, split stocks outperform nonsplits by 35% per annum. Something like that. The author posited some trading rules that indicated as much.

Regards,
Morgan



To: Gregg Powers who wrote (27288)4/16/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
LWIN mentioned on CNBC now. Jon. eom.



To: Gregg Powers who wrote (27288)4/16/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
I agree with you thats what i was saying. Wouldnt you think having more shares actually creates more volatility, and a lower short term price? I was always under the impression that if you increase the shares, there are more weak investors who would sell when Cabi downgrades! I would rather have a 250 dollar stock that keeps out the rif raf!