Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: who cares? who wrote (30822)	4/16/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: trader14U	Respond to of 122087

Why can't they put Greenspan on at nite that way I wouldn't have to take sleeping pills....

To: who cares? who wrote (30822)	4/16/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: If only I'd held	Respond to of 122087

I was just thinking the same thing. This is too funny. If Anthony could just see us now. :o)

To: who cares? who wrote (30822)	4/16/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: J.Y. Wang	Respond to of 122087

I don't think that's inconsistent with the philosophy of this thread, which is to short stocks which are over-valued and about to tank. We now know that our past definition of "over-valued" is no longer valid. It is perfectly legitimate to ride the flying POS up and, when it starts to crack, ride it down on the short side. I don't see any added value in watching on the sidelines while the POS flies higher and higher and then coming in only when we think it's going to tank.